A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Optimal Extent of Transhiatal Gastrectomy and Lymphadenectomy for the Stomach-Predominant Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: Retrospective Single-Institution Study in China. | LitMetric

The optimal extent of gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer is controversial. Our study aimed to compare the long-term survival of transhiatal proximal gastrectomy with extended periproximal lymphadenectomy (THPG with EPL) and transhiatal total gastrectomy with complete perigastric lymphadenectomy (THTG with CPL) for patients with the stomach-predominant EGJ cancer. Between January 2004, and August 2015, 306 patients with Siewert II tumors were divided into the THTG group ( = 148) and the THPG group ( = 158). Their long-term survival was compared according to Nishi's classification. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the distribution of age, gender, tumor size or Nishi's type ( > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed in terms of pathological tumor stage ( < 0.05). The 5-year overall survival rates were 62.0% in the THPG group and 59.5% in the THTG group. The hazard ratio for death was 0.455 (95% CI, 0.337 to 0.613; log-rank < 0.001). Type GE/E = G showed a worse prognosis compared with Type G ( < 0.05). Subgroup analysis stratified by Nishi's classification, Stage IA-IIB and IIIA, and tumor size ≤ 30 mm indicated significant survival advantages for the THPG group ( < 0.05). However, this analysis failed to show a survival benefit in Stage IIIB ( > 0.05). Nishi's classification is an effective method to clarify the subdivision of Siewert II tumors with a diameter ≤ 40 mm above or below the EGJ. THPG with EPL is an optimal procedure for the patients with the stomach-predominant EGJ tumors ≤30 mm in diameter and in Stage IA-IIIA. For more advanced and larger EGJ tumors, further studies are required to confirm the necessity of THTG with CPL.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6348947PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00639DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thpg group
12
nishi's classification
12
optimal extent
8
gastrectomy lymphadenectomy
8
esophagogastric junction
8
egj cancer
8
long-term survival
8
thpg epl
8
thtg cpl
8
patients stomach-predominant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!