Characterizing slip-like responses during gait using an entire support surface perturbation: Comparisons to previously established slip methods.

Background: The characteristics of experimentally induced slips (low-friction surfaces and non-motorized platforms) in laboratory settings are influenced by participant gait velocity, contact surface area, and level of friction between the foot and surface. However, motorized platforms that could account for these factors during slip-like paradigms have not been extensively used.

Research Question: How does slip-like perturbations evoked via a motorized platform change gait characteristics and postural stability during overground walking?

Methods: Ten healthy young adults performed 4 overground, self-paced walking trials, with the 4 trial including an unexpected forward support surface translation at heel-strike during steady state walking. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected, with step characteristics (time, distance, velocity) and postural stability calculated to compare between normal gait and slip-like trials. Slip foot characteristics were also determined.

Results: Peak slipping foot velocity variability was considerably smaller compared to previously reported low-friction and non-motorized perturbations. The centre of mass was shifted more posteriorly (thus in a less stable location) by the end of the platform acceleration phase compared to the same time point post-heel strike during normal gait trials. Participants successfully responded to every slip-like perturbation by significantly increasing step time, decreasing step distance, and decreasing step velocity.

Significance: Our results demonstrate the repeatability and consistency of a motorized support surface paradigm to induce slip-like perturbations. Furthermore, stability and step characteristic results confirm posterior shifts in stability and appropriate stepping responses, mimicking how participants would react if responding to a real world slip.