Litigating a right to treatment: Woe is me.

Psychiatr Q

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Nassau County Medical Center, New York.

Published: April 1989

The right to treatment was first proposed by Birnbaum in 1960. While its constitutional basis may still be in doubt, it has found significant acceptance in state legislation and in lower court decisions. Defining, implementing, and quantifying this right remain elusive. For well over a decade, the case of Walter Woe has been litigated in the federal courts of New York. It represents a continuing effort to obtain a level of care for patients involuntarily hospitalized in the public sector equal to that provided for those admitted voluntarily to general and private hospitals. A precommitment right to refuse inadequate treatment is a novel extension of the right to treatment, with potentially significant implications, and is part of the continuing legal battle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01064242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

litigating treatment
4
treatment woe
4
woe treatment
4
treatment proposed
4
proposed birnbaum
4
birnbaum 1960
4
1960 constitutional
4
constitutional basis
4
basis doubt
4
doubt acceptance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!