Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A mutagenic evaluation of captan, folpet, captafol, dichlofluanid and related compounds was carried out using the Salmonella/mammalian microsome test using strains TA102 and TA104. These strains contain A-T base pairs at the site of the mutation in contrast to the other Salmonella tester strains that detect mutagens damaging G-C base pairs. In addition, the excision repair system of the TA102 strain is still intact. Captan and folpet were mutagenic in strain TA104, captafol was mutagenic in strain TA102, whereas the remaining test compounds (dichlofluanid, tetrahydrophthalimide and thiozolidine-4-carboxylic acid) were not mutagenic in either strain. In conclusion, we consider it of value to add these two strains to those already used in the Ames test in order to increase confidence in our ability to detect mutagens and to shed further light on their mechanism of action.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/3.6.467 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!