AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the radiological outcomes and complications of single- versus multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a PEEK cage-plate system with 57 enrolled patients.
  • Multilevel ACDF shows a significantly longer fusion time, especially in the 3-level and 4-level groups, compared to the 1-level group, while the lordotic angles altered in all groups post-surgery.
  • Cage subsidence rates increased with the number of levels treated, and changes in adjacent segmental disc height were more notable in multilevel ACDF, suggesting a need for longer follow-up to monitor potential complications.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to compare the differences in radiological outcomes and complications between single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage-plate fusion system.Fifty-seven patients who underwent ACDF via the PEEK cage-plate fusion system were enrolled and subjected to ≥6 months of follow-up. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to different cage-plate implantation levels: 1-level group (n = 17), 2-level group (n = 24), 3-level group (n = 12), and 4-level group (n = 4). Fusion time, changes in segment and global lordotic angle, subsidence rate, and changes in disc and adjacent segmental disc height were subjected to radiological evaluation.The fusion period of multilevel ACDF was longer than that of single-level ACDF. The fusion period of the 3-level (4.09 ± 0.94, P = .004) and 4-level (5.25 ± 0.89, P = .004) group was also significantly longer than that of the 1-level group. The mean lordotic angle in all of the groups was changed in the immediate postoperative period and in the final follow-up. The cage subsidence rates were 11.76% (2/17) in the 1-level group, 20.83% (5/24) in the 2-level group, and 2/12 (16.67%) in the 3-level group. No subsidence occurred in the 4-level groups. Changes in the lower adjacent segmental disc height were significantly increased in multilevel ACDF compared with those in single-level ACDF.Despite the longer fusion time, the outcomes of the proposed system were even better with the greater number of treatment levels by using PEEK cage-plate fusion system. Changes in the lower adjacent segmental disc height should also prolong follow-up duration to investigate the symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration in multilevel ACDF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380763PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014277DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peek cage-plate
16
cage-plate fusion
16
fusion system
12
1-level group
12
adjacent segmental
12
segmental disc
12
disc height
12
multilevel acdf
12
fusion
10
group
9

Similar Publications

Introduction: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is the standard surgical procedure for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, although ACDF includes risks of adjacent segment disease (ASD) and subsequent revision procedures. Various interbody cage, plate, and screw options can be utilized. Stand-alone devices were designed to overcome undesired complications of hardware prominence and associated dysphagia, soft tissue violation, and adjacent level encroachment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We aimed to investigate the feasibility of multi-acquisition with variable resonance image combination slab selectivity inversion recovery (MAVRIC SL IR) sequence on 3.0 T MRI in patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery compared to bandwidth-optimized short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence.

Methods: Paired sagittal MR images of MAVRIC SL IR and bandwidth-optimized STIR sequences were acquired and analyzed for 21 patients after ACDF surgery with PEEK cage-plate construct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study compares the radiological outcomes and complications of single- versus multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a PEEK cage-plate system with 57 enrolled patients.
  • Multilevel ACDF shows a significantly longer fusion time, especially in the 3-level and 4-level groups, compared to the 1-level group, while the lordotic angles altered in all groups post-surgery.
  • Cage subsidence rates increased with the number of levels treated, and changes in adjacent segmental disc height were more notable in multilevel ACDF, suggesting a need for longer follow-up to monitor potential complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a choice of surgical procedure for cervical degenerative diseases associated with radiculopathy or myelopathy. However, the patients undergoing ACDF still have problems. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the radiologic results of 3 different methods in single-level ACDF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the clinical and radiographic efficacy of a new zero-profile anchored spacer called the ROI-C in anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

Method: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, radiological outcomes and complications of multilevel ACDF with the ROI-C or with the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate. From April 2011 to April 2014, 60 patients with MCSM were operated on using ACDF, with the ROI-C in 28 patients and PEEK cages with an anterior plate in 32 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!