Background: Efficient, nonbiased methods for screening residency candidates are lacking. The purpose of this study is to highlight the design, implementation, and impact of the Selection Tool for Applicants to Residency (STAR), an objective approach to selecting candidates to interview for residency selection purposes.
Materials And Methods: Single-institution retrospective cohort study of medical student applicants and current residents of a single otolaryngology residency program from 2008 to 2015 was performed. STAR was introduced to the selection process in 2013 with no USMLE cutoff score needed to receive an interview. Single-institution review of otolaryngology residency program applications from 2008 to 2015 was performed. STAR was introduced in 2013. In addition to applicants, we analyzed characteristics of residents who successfully matched into our program. Prealgorithm residents (n = 16) and postalgorithm residents (n = 12) were compared to assess the impact of this approach on characteristics of successfully matched residents at the program.
Results: Three hundred sixty-five applications were analyzed. Applicant pools before and after algorithm displayed similar characteristics. Interestingly, while there was no USMLE "cutoff," scores significantly increased after algorithm. There was no significant difference in the proportion of women (P = 0.588) or underrepresented minorities (P = 0.587) invited to interview pre- and post-STAR. The algorithm significantly decreased the time needed to review applications and interview residency candidates without impacting the overall composition of the interviewee pool.
Conclusions: Traditional application review methods can be time consuming and may not ensure effective screening of applicants. STAR, or similar objective tools, may be a viable alternative to evaluate applicants, reduce evaluative time, and potentially decrease the impact of unconscious bias.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.057 | DOI Listing |
Can Fam Physician
January 2025
Vice-Chair of Quality and Innovation in the DFCM at U of T; Associate Professor in the Faculty of Medicine and the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at U of T; Scientist in the MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St Michael's Hospital; and a staff physician in the DFCM at St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto.
Objective: To understand the role of primary care in the COVID-19 pandemic to provide insight into its functioning and inform potential reforms.
Composition Of The Committee: The now dissolved Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table (Science Table) was formed in July 2020 to provide decision makers and the public with a synthesis of rapidly evolving evidence related to COVID-19. The Science Table was based at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, and supported by Public Health Ontario.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: The aim of this study was to develop an accurate and clinically relevant prediction model for 30-day mortality following hip fracture surgery.
Methods: A previous study protocol was utilized as a guideline for data collection and as the standard for the hip fracture treatment. Two prospective, detailed hip fracture databases of 2 different hospitals (hospital A, training cohort; hospital B, testing cohort) were utilized to obtain data.
Gut
January 2025
Division of Clinical Microbiology,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden
Background: Tumour-infiltrating T cells can mediate both antitumour immunity and promote tumour progression by creating an immunosuppressive environment. This dual role is especially relevant in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), characterised by a unique microenvironment and limited success with current immunotherapy.
Objective: We evaluated T cell responses in patients with advanced HCC by analysing tumours, liver flushes and liver-draining lymph nodes, to understand whether reactive T cell populations could be identified despite the immunosuppressive environment.
Front Public Health
January 2025
School of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Background: The term "danger signs" refers to any symptoms or indicators that suggest a pregnant woman may be at risk during pregnancy. Mothers are often burdened with responsibilities, and the majority of them do not even receive treatment for potential complications, which can ultimately lead to the loss of their lives. This situation highlights the barriers that prevent them from being properly prepared for potential risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Understanding how a research sample compares to the population from which it is drawn can help inform future recruitment planning. We compared the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (WADRC) participant sample to the Wisconsin state population (WI-pop) on key demographic, social exposome, and vascular risk measures.
Methods: The WADRC sample included 930 participants.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!