We have compared the performance of different machine learning techniques for human activity recognition. Experiments were made using a benchmark dataset where each subject wore a device in the pocket and another on the wrist. The dataset comprises thirteen activities, including physical activities, common postures, working activities and leisure activities. We apply a methodology known as the activity recognition chain, a sequence of steps involving preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction and classification for traditional machine learning methods; we also tested convolutional deep learning networks that operate on raw data instead of using computed features. Results show that combination of two sensors does not necessarily result in an improved accuracy. We have determined that best results are obtained by the extremely randomized trees approach, operating on precomputed features and on data obtained from the wrist sensor. Deep learning architectures did not produce competitive results with the tested architecture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6386875PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19030521DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine learning
12
deep learning
12
activity recognition
12
learning techniques
8
learning
6
comparison machine
4
learning deep
4
techniques activity
4
recognition mobile
4
mobile devices
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!