Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for grading motor function in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI).
Methods: Two neurosurgical residents and 2 faculty members performed motor examinations in 6 chronic incomplete SCI patients for a total of 156 muscle groups. Examinations were performed using the modified MRC grading scale during routine clinic visits for each patient. Informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. Patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grade A (ASIA A) injuries were excluded. Inter-rater reliability coefficients were calculated using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Results: Sixty-four percent of the tested variables demonstrated extremely strong (W 0.71-0.9) or strong (0.51-0.7) inter-rater reliability using Kendall's coefficient of concordance and an ICC corresponding to excellent (ICC > 0.75) or fair to good (ICC 0.4-0.75) inter-rater reliability. An additional 7% showed poor inter-rater reliability (ICC < 0.4). The remaining variables tested did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions: The inter-rater reliability of the modified MRC scale was found to be high in the majority of tested variables, but the results suggest that discrepancy among trained observers does exist. Reliability was greatest in the lower-extremity muscle groups and least in the upper-extremity muscle groups in patients with chronic incomplete SCI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18508 | DOI Listing |
J Neurol Phys Ther
December 2024
Department of Physical Therapy, Motor Control Laboratory (LADECOM), Centre of Healthy and Sport Sciences, University of Santa Catarina State, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Background And Purpose: Telerehabilitation represents an alternative for individuals who have difficulty accessing services to receive care. Therefore, telerehabilitation measures must be studied for their reliability and validity. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the videoconference-based Berg Balance Scale assessment in stroke survivors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Surg Oncol
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Introduction: This study aimed to develop and validate an aesthetic grading tool (AGT) for bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and investigate the correlation of BREAST-Q scores with perceived aesthetic outcomes.
Methods: The AGT utilized a Likert scale to rate aesthetic outcomes based on photographs of post-reconstruction breasts. The validation involved iterative testing with healthcare providers and patients.
Neurourol Urodyn
December 2024
Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Objective: To test the Intra- and inter-rater reliability, measurement error and criteria and convergent validities of the Dualpex Plus (DP) for vaginal manometry in women with urinary incontinence (UI).
Design: This is a clinimetric properties study.
Setting: University Hospital in Brazil.
Front Sports Act Living
December 2024
Department of Health Sciences, Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
Introduction: Officials are essential in terms of player safety and injury prevention, especially in contact team sports such as ice hockey, where numerous fast pace and high force contacts occur. If against the rules, these collisions can result in penalties. However, there is limited literature on the inter-rater reliability of the officials' decisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Simul (Lond)
December 2024
Medical Education Directorate, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Background: Behavioural marker systems are used across several healthcare disciplines to assess behavioural (non-technical) skills, but rater training is variable, and inter-rater reliability is generally poor. Inter-rater reliability provides data about the tool, but not the competence of individual raters. This study aimed to test the inter-rater reliability of a new behavioural marker system (PhaBS - pharmacists' behavioural skills) with clinically experienced faculty raters and near-peer raters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!