Expansive Suspension Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Surgical Technique and Outcomes Over 8 Years of Follow-up.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iseikai Hospital, Sugahara, Higashiyodogawa-ku, Osaka, Japan (Dr. Kakiuchi); the Spine and Spinal Cord Center, Osaka Police Hospital, Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka, Japan (Dr. Wada); the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, North Osaka Police Hospital, Muroyama, Ibaraki-shi, Osaka, Japan (Dr. Harada); and the Department of Public Health, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, Japan (Mr. Ito and Dr. Fukushima).

Published: October 2018

Introduction: To maximize the benefits of posterior decompression for severe multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis, we refined the expansive laminoplasty technique using a spinous process-splitting approach. This study tests the hypothesis that the surgical benefit of adequate decompression with posterior element preservation is maintained in the long term, over 8 years of follow-up.

Methods: Fifty-eight patients were followed up yearly for 8 years. Eight patients having nonlumbar spine surgery or Parkinson disease were excluded. The noninferiority of the 8-year versus peak-year outcomes was tested, with margins of 5 points for the Oswestry disability index and 1 point for the numeric rating scales (NRSs).

Results: In the 50 patients available for follow-up, the peak values of the mean improvements from baseline within the first 7 years were 35.8, 5.7, 5.9, and 2.8 points for the Oswestry disability index, low back pain NRS, leg pain NRS, and leg numbness NRS, respectively. The 95% lower confidence limits for the differences between the mean improvements from baseline at 8 years and the peak year were within the noninferiority margins for each scale.

Conclusion: Our technique was associated with substantial improvement from baseline for each scale. The initial improvements in function and symptoms were maintained for 8 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6324890PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinous process-splitting
8
process-splitting approach
8
lumbar spinal
8
spinal stenosis
8
points oswestry
8
oswestry disability
8
improvements baseline
8
baseline years
8
pain nrs
8
nrs leg
8

Similar Publications

The traditional posterior median approach laminectomy is widely used for lumbar decompression. However, the bilateral dissection of paraspinal muscles during this procedure often leads to postoperative muscle atrophy, chronic low back pain, and other complications. The posterior midline spinous process-splitting approach (SPSA) offers a significant advantage over the traditional approach by minimizing damage to the paraspinal muscles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the combined spinous process-splitting approach with a Wiltse (SPSW) approach, the combined conventional approach with a Wiltse (CW) approach, and the conventional open (CO) approach in unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Methods: The clinical outcomes were assessed, and intraoperative data and complications were collected. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for low back pain and leg pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) scores for evaluating functions of the lumbar spine and health-related quality of life, and the modified MacNab standard for assessing satisfaction were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of different posterior decompression techniques for LSS. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is one of the most common degenerative spinal diseases that result in claudication, back and leg pain, and disability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This study aimed to compare postoperative pain and surgical outcomes of open-door laminoplasty (LP) and three types of muscle-sparing laminoplasties, namely unilateral muscle-preservation laminoplasty (UL), spinous process splitting double-door laminoplasty (DL) and intermuscular "raising roof" laminoplasty (RL) for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy (MDCM).

Methods: Consecutive MDCM patients underwent LP or modified laminoplasties (UL, DL, RL) in 2022 were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To describe unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) via a modified hemilateral spinous process-splitting (MHSPS) approach and determine its effectiveness.

Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients with the lumbar degenerative disease who underwent MHSPS TLIF between August 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain were evaluated before surgery and at the last follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!