In previous reports, 5% sulfamylon solution has been utilized on unexcised burns and granulation tissue. We prospectively evaluated 67 burn patients to determine graft take and the incidence of side effects with use of sulfamylon solution dressings after excision and grafting. Of patients excised and grafted, the mean graft take for a total of 100 procedures was 86%. Rash occurred in 18% of patients and sulfamylon was discontinued with no sequelae. Twenty-five percent had at least one positive fungal wound culture, yet only 3% required treatment for candidemia. Those patients who developed a rash and fungal colonization had a significantly larger percent burn and were treated with sulfamylon for a longer period of time. Pain intensity was rated on a Visual Analog Scale with a mean score of 2.4; in no case was the pain considered severe enough by the patient to terminate treatment. Acidosis was present in 3% of patients but felt to be unrelated to the sulfamylon treatment. As an antimicrobial agent, 5% sulfamylon solution is a viable alternative for fresh autografts with excellent graft take and acceptable side effects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004630-198811000-00005 | DOI Listing |
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res
October 2024
Arizona Burn Center, Valleywise Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Over 40,000 patients in the United States (US) require hospitalization for burns annually. The treatment regimen can cost more than $6,000 a day and requires the use of numerous supplies to ensure the graft takes for successful wound healing. Irrigation of the wound is a critical step for burn treatment, yet little is known about the cost-effectiveness of different irrigation modalities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Burns Trauma
August 2024
Brooke Army Medical Center Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
J Burn Care Res
January 2025
The Burn Center, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010-2975, USA.
Recognition of invasive burn wound sepsis as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in burn-injured patients has profoundly changed the management of burn wounds and its associated complications. The development of effective topical antimicrobial therapy is one of the last major developments of modern burn care and has been driven by major world events and scientific breakthroughs. Topical antimicrobial burn care has evolved from the use of anecdotal remedies to scientific breakthroughs such as Moyer's successful dilution of silver nitrate solution, Fox's described benefit of silver sulfadiazine use in animal models, and Pruitt's dramatic improvement in post-burn mortality using topical mafenide acetate in burn wounds.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAntibiotics (Basel)
January 2024
Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany.
Since burn wound infections caused by (PA) lead to major complications and sepsis, this study evaluates the antimicrobial efficacy of the wound irrigation solutions Prontosan (PRT), Lavanox (LAV), citric acid (CA) and mafenide acetate (MA) using microbiology assays and an ex vivo skin wound model. In suspension assays, all the solutions showed significant reductions in bacterial number (log reduction: CA 5.77; LAV 4.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Infection related skin graft loss still remains as a common problem even with the use of systemic antibiotics. Mafenide acetate (Sulfamylon) is a topical antimicrobial agent with a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity. Since mafenide acetate has the ability to penetrate the burn eschar, it was preferred in the treatment of infected full-thickness skin grafts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!