In An NHS Trust and others v Y and another, the Supreme Court was asked to address the question of whether a court order must always be obtained before clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH), which is keeping alive a person with a prolonged disorder of consciousness (PDOC). This case note explores the Court's decision to dispense with the need for such a court order and analyses that important change in approach from the perspective of the right to life protected in Article 2 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) as well as in the broader context of end of life decision-making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwy043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nhs trust
8
court order
8
trust [2018]
4
[2018] uksc
4
uksc reducing
4
reducing role
4
role courts
4
courts treatment
4
treatment withdrawal
4
withdrawal nhs
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!