Aims: Per standard of care, dual-chamber pacemakers are programmed in DDDR mode with fixed atrioventricular (AV) delay or with long AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing. We aimed to evaluate whether the PR interval may be a specific criterion of choice between standard DDDR, to preserve AV synchrony in long PR patients, and managed ventricular pacing (MVP), to avoid ventricular desynchronization imposed by right ventricle apical pacing, in short PR patients.
Methods And Results: In the MINERVA trial, 1166 patients were randomized to Control DDDR, MVP, or atrial anti-tachycardia pacing plus MVP (DDDRP + MVP). We evaluated the interaction of PR interval with pacing mode by comparing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) longer than 7 consecutive days as a function of PR interval. Out of 906 patients with available data, the median PR interval was 180 ms. The PR interval was found to significantly (P = 0.012) interact with pacing mode for AF incidence: the risk of AF > 7 days was lower [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.34-0.99; P = 0.047] in patients with short PR (shorter than median PR) if programmed in MVP mode compared with DDDR mode and it was lower (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99; P = 0.049) in patients with long PR (equal to or longer than median PR) if programmed in DDDR mode compared with MVP.
Conclusion: Our data show that PR interval may be used as a selection criterion to identify the optimal physiological pacing mode. Persistent AF incidence was lower in short PR patients treated by right ventricular pacing minimization and in long PR patients treated by standard dual-chamber pacing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy286 | DOI Listing |
Pan Afr Med J
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, Aristide Le Dantec Hospital, Dakar, Senegal.
Introduction: cardiac pacing is the only lifesaving procedure which is effective for major cardiac conduction disorders. In sub-Saharan Africa, few pacemakers are implanted, compared to Western countries. This study aimed to describe the indications for cardiac pacing in four hospitals in Senegal, to evaluate its practical modalities, to identify pacemaker's complications and their predisposing factors and to evaluate the main challenges for cardiac pacing in Senegal.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm Heart J
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, San Maurizio Regional Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone treatment for heart failure, yet the optimal pacing mode remains uncertain. This study investigates the impact of DDDR (rate-adaptive atrial support) versus VDD pacing modes on functional capacity and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with CRT-defibrillators.
Methods: In a multicenter, double-blind, crossover trial, 26 sinus rhythm patients undergoing CRT-defibrillator implantation were randomized to DDDR at 60 beats-per-minute or VDD at 30 beats-per-minute.
PLOS Digit Health
December 2024
Department of Health Research, imec The Netherlands / Holst Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and early assessment of carotid artery abnormalities with ultrasound is key for effective prevention. Obtaining the carotid diameter waveform is essential for hemodynamic parameter extraction. However, since it is not a trivial task to automate, compact computational models are needed to operate reliably in view of physiological variability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEcho Res Pract
December 2024
1st Cardiology Department, General Hospital of Nikea, Agios Panteleimon, 3 D. Mantouvalou str., 18454, Athens, Greece.
World J Cardiol
November 2024
Department of Cardiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow 226003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation has the potential to impact left ventricular (LV) function and hence quality of life (QoL) in the long term.
Aim: To assess the effect of single- and dual-chamber pacing on LV function and QoL.
Methods: This study included 56 patients who underwent permanent pacing: Dual pacing, dual sensing, dual responsive and rate responsive (DDDR) for the initial 3 months and ventricular pacing, ventricular sensing, inhibited response and rate responsive (VVIR) for the next 3 months, and DDDR mode for the last 3 months.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!