Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?

Pediatr Surg Int

Departments of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, P.O.B 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.

Published: March 2019

Purpose: RALP is rapidly becoming the new gold standard treatment for UPJO in children, who suffer from uretero-pelvic obstruction (UPJO). However, presently there is a lack of data regarding the outcomes of RALP in young infants and smaller children. This study aims to compare the outcomes of RALP in children weighing less than 10 kg and matched with an analogous cohort who underwent open pyeloplasty (OP).

Methods: We prospectively compared patients who underwent RALP to a matched cohort of patients who underwent OP from our retrospectively acquired data registry. Comparative outcomes included: Demographics, success rate, complications, and length of hospital stay, postoperative pain score and failure rate. Failure was defined as the need for a secondary intervention for UPJO, or worsening hydronephrosis during follow-up.

Results: A total of 15 patients with a median age of 8 months (range 5-11 months) and median weight 7 kg (range 5.6-9.8 kg) underwent RALP between 2016 and 2018, a matched cohort of 15 children who underwent OP similar in terms of age, weight, gender and affected side between 2014 and 2016. All children had prenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis and underwent surgery utilizing combined general and regional (Caudal MO) anesthesia. Intrinsic obstruction was present in 13 of RALP group (86.7%) and in 14 in OP group (93.3%). Mean operative time was 67.8 + 13.4 min in RALP group, while 66.5 + 9.5 min in OP group. (p = 0.76) All but two patients in RALP group had stent inserted and required subsequent anesthesia for stent removal, while all OP children had a Salle Pyeloplasty stent inserted during the procedure and underwent removal in an ambulatory setting without the need for anesthesia. There were no failures recorded in the RALP group, while one patient in OP required a secondary intervention. Mean hospital stay was 1 day (1-2 days) for RALP and 2 days (2-3 days) for OP. There was no difference in FLACC Pain Scale in both groups. Clavien-Dindo grade I-II complications occurred in one patient from each group. Two patients from RALP underwent subsequent ureteral reimplantation due to accompanying uretero-vescical junction obstruction.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that RALP can be performed safely in pediatric patients weighing less than 10 kg. with similar outcomes when compared to patients undergoing an open procedure for the same pathology.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04435-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ralp group
16
ralp
13
outcomes ralp
8
weighing 10 kg
8
underwent
8
compared patients
8
patients underwent
8
underwent ralp
8
matched cohort
8
hospital stay
8

Similar Publications

Lateral decubitus: its influence on hemodynamic and respiratory function during retroperitoneal robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (R-RALP) in children.

J Robot Surg

January 2025

Department of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, 149, Rue de Sèvres 75015, Paris, France.

Retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (R-RALP) is the commonest urologic procedure performed in children, entailing retroperitoneal CO2 insufflation and lateral decubitus, whose effects on cardiopulmonary variables are poorly known. We, therefore, studied hemodynamic and respiratory changes due to CO2 insufflation and lateral decubitus in children undergoing R-RALP and their effects on regional tissue oxygenation. Between 1/2021 and 7/2024, children affected by ureteropelvic joint obstruction (UPJO) underwent a pyeloplasty by R-RALP at Necker Enfants Malades Hospital (Paris, France), using a standardized surgical technique and a lung-protecting anesthetic protocol aimed to prevent hypercarbia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) is the standard treatment for prostate cancer, with specific techniques developed for men who already have an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP).
  • - Two surgical techniques, the No Touch Technique and Safe Mobilization Technique, aim to preserve the pelvic reservoir during RALP, with no significant differences in surgical outcomes between men with IPP and those without.
  • - Analysis of 155 RALP cases with IPPs showed successful postoperative device functionality, no significant complications, and no negative impact on urinary continence or cancer recurrence rates compared to men without IPPs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) versus radical prostatectomy (RP) alone in patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted surgery.
  • - Data from 1,023 patients were analyzed, with results showing that those who received NCHT had a lower rate of biochemical recurrence (15.8% vs. 29.5%) and better pathology outcomes compared to the RP-only group.
  • - The findings indicate that NCHT could be a beneficial pre-surgery treatment for high-risk prostate cancer, improving outcomes without significant safety concerns, although some adverse events were noted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The rise of frail patients in the worldwide population poses a challenge in the prostate cancer surgical care. In this light, we aimed to compare perioperative and early surgical outcomes of Extraperitoneal Single Port (SP)- vs Transperitoneal Multiport (MP) - Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RALP) in different frailty settings.

Materials And Methods: Clinical and surgical data of all consecutive patients treated with RALP between March 2014 and October 2023 were gathered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate how the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol impacts outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP).
  • A total of 57 children were randomly assigned to either the ERAS group or a control group, with the analysis focusing on various recovery metrics such as hospital stay length, bowel recovery, complications, and pain levels.
  • Results showed that the ERAS group had a shorter hospital stay, quicker bowel function recovery, and fewer complications; children over 4 years also reported lower pain levels post-surgery compared to those in the control group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!