Prophphylactic bilateral salpingngectomy: why is it worthwhile?

Dev Period Med

Oddział Kliniczny Onkologii i Immunoonkologii, Warmińsko-Mazurskie Centrum Onkologii, Szpital Ministerstwa Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji w Olsztynie, Polska.

Published: October 2019

Malignant tumors of the ovary are characterized by late detection which is the chief factor responsible for their poor prognosis. Almost 70% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at clinical stage III or IV. At present, effective methods for early detection of ovarian cancer are lacking. One accepted approach to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer is bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. However, it is increasingly widely believed that even a more limited surgery of bilateral salpingectomy may be also used prophylactically as an effective means to reduce cancer risk. The procedure is based on extensive anatomopathological research on the origins of malignant cells in ovarian cancer. There is already ample scientific evidence that in a high proportion of cases the primary site of neoplastic transformation is the distal segment of the fallopian tube, from which malignant cells migrate to the ovary. However, long-term studies demonstrating the effectiveness of prophylactic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer are required. This article summarizes the benefits and disadvantages of the procedure based on currently available literature.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8522816PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.34763/devperiodmed.20182204.390395DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ovarian cancer
16
procedure based
8
malignant cells
8
ovarian
5
cancer
5
prophphylactic bilateral
4
bilateral salpingngectomy
4
salpingngectomy worthwhile?
4
worthwhile? malignant
4
malignant tumors
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!