Background: Surgical management of aortic arch diseases is one of the most challenging issues in cardiovascular surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome after frozen elephant trunk (FET) with conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique.

Methods: Out of a total of 551 patients after thoracic aortic surgery, we analyzed 70 consecutive patients, who underwent aortic arch replacement with ET or FET technique between 2001 and 2017 in our institution. The patients were case-control matched in regard to such variables as age, sex, presence of an acute aortic dissection and necessity for concomitant procedures. The analysis included 25 patient pairs.

Results: Among the 25 FET patients, eleven patients were female, the median age was 69, 15 (60%) patients had an aortic dissection and thirteen needed various concomitant procedures. In the second group, treated with conventional ET technique, 10 (40%) patients were female, the median age was 66 years, thirteen presented with an aortic dissection and 16 (64%) underwent concomitant procedures. These and other characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. In-hospital mortality was statistically similar: 5 (20%) in the FET group 8 (32%) for ET group (P=0.52). The incidence of stroke, acute renal failure and postoperative bleeding was comparable. The length of stay in the intensive care unit did not differ between the cohorts (P=0.258). Predictors of in-hospital mortality were length of the operation, bleeding postoperatively, and acute renal failure. The one-year survival rates were higher in the FET cohort compared to the conventional approach (60% 38%), however without statistical significance.

Conclusion: In regard to the short- and mid-term outcome, there were only slight differences between both techniques. In patients with extensive aneurysmal aortic disease, conventional ET and FET procedures seem to be associated with acceptable satisfactory mid-term outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6297428PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.10.42DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

elephant trunk
16
aortic arch
12
aortic dissection
12
concomitant procedures
12
arch replacement
8
frozen elephant
8
patients
8
patients female
8
female median
8
median age
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To develop an unsupervised artificial intelligence algorithm for identifying and quantifying the presence of false lumen thrombosis (FL) after Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) operation in computed tomography angiographic (CTA) images in an interdisciplinary approach.

Methods: CTA datasets were retrospectively collected from eight patients after FET operation for aortic dissection from a single center. Of those, five patients had a residual aortic dissection with partial false lumen thrombosis, and three patients had no false lumen or thrombosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

CHALLENGING PROXIMAL CONTROL FOR OPEN THORACOABDOMINAL REPAIR.

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

December 2024

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, UTMB-Galveston, Galveston, TX. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • Proximal control of the thoracic aorta during surgery can be difficult due to the complex nature of thoracoabdominal aortic repairs.
  • Different techniques, including deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and staged methods like the frozen elephant trunk procedure, have been developed to tackle these difficulties.
  • The paper reviews these challenges and explains the reasoning for using various surgical approaches.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessment of the quality of life comparison between open and endovascular aortic arch surgery: a pilot study.

J Cardiothorac Surg

December 2024

Department of Vascular, Endovascular and Transplant Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch, Canterbury, 8140, New Zealand.

Background: Advancement in endovascular endografts have paved the way to the possibility of performing endovascular aortic arch repair in recent years. This has started to supersede the need for open aortic arch surgery. There remains a paucity of data looking into the quality of life comparison between open aortic arch surgery and endovascular aortic arch repair.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Acute type A aortic dissection (A-AAD) with severe acute aortic regurgitation (AR) and coronary involvement is a potentially fatal condition that causes left ventricular volume overload and catastrophic acute myocardial infarction. We present the successful management of a patient using Impella 5.5 following cardiopulmonary arrest caused by A-AAD with severe acute AR and left main trunk (LMT) obstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!