Increased blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) is associated with high cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis. Studies on the effects of antihypertensive drugs on BPV in hemodialysis are scarce. This study examines the effects of nebivolol and irbesartan on short-term BPV in patients with intradialytic hypertension. This randomized-cross-over study included 38 patients (age: 60.4 ± 11.1 years, male: 65.8%) with intradialytic hypertension (intradialytic-SBP increase ≥ 10 mmHg at ≥4 over 6 consecutive sessions). After the baseline evaluation, participants were randomized to nebivolol 5 mg and subsequently irbesartan 150 mg, or vice versa, with a two-week wash-out period before initiation of the second drug. Patients underwent three respective 24 h-ABPM sessions starting before a midweek-session. We calculated the standard deviation (SD), weighted SD (wSD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV) of BP with validated formulas. The post-hemodialysis and 24 h-SBP and DBP levels were significantly lower after treatment with both drugs. The systolic-BPV indices were marginally lower after nebivolol but not after irbesartan compared to baseline (SD: baseline 15.70 ± 4.69; nebivolol 14.45 ± 3.37, p = 0.090; irbesartan 15.39 ± 3.85, p = 0.706; wSD: 14.62 ± 4.36 vs 13.40 ± 3.07, p = 0.053 vs 14.36 ± 3.47, p = 0.805, respectively). The diastolic-BPV indices decreased with nebivolol and increased with irbesartan, resulting in significant differences between the two drugs (SD: baseline 10.56 ± 2.50; nebivolol 9.75 ± 2.12; irbesartan 10.84 ± 1.98, between-drug p = 0.014; wSD: baseline 9.86 ± 2.12; nebivolol 9.34 ± 2.01; irbesartan 10.25 ± 2.01, between-drug p = 0.029). The diastolic-BPV during intradialytic and day-time periods was marginally lower with nebivolol than with irbesartan. During nighttime, the BPV indices were unchanged with either drug. The short-term BPV was reduced after nebivolol but not after irbesartan treatment in patients with intradialytic hypertension. These findings suggest that sympathetic-overdrive may be a major factor that affects BPV in intradialytic hypertension patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41440-018-0194-2 | DOI Listing |
Curr Hypertens Rep
November 2024
First Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Purpose Of Review: To summarize the current evidence regarding epidemiology, clinical pathophysiology, and latest therapeutic approaches for the management of intradialytic hypertension (IDH).
Recent Findings: IDH is a rather common complication of dialysis, affecting 10-15% of the patient population and significantly increasing the cardiovascular risk. Its pathophysiology involves multiple mechanisms, including volume and sodium overload, sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) overactivity, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness.
Am J Med Sci
November 2024
Department of Medicine, Division of Renal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree Street, MOT 12th Floor, Nephrology, Atlanta, GA 30308, United States. Electronic address:
Objective: Retrospective study to examine the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI-D) patients that received outpatient hemodialysis as part of continued AKI-D care and explore factors associated with recovery of kidney function and discontinuation of dialysis.
Methods: Records of all admissions to Emory Dialysis centers between January 2010 to December 2021 were reviewed to include patients with confirmed diagnosis of AKI-D. Basic demographics, comorbidities, duration of hospitalization and cause of AKI were extracted from hospital records and cross-referenced with the dialysis center electronic health record.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed)
November 2024
Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
Introduction: Intradialytic hypertension (IDH) is a poorly understood phenomenon with no consensus on its definition, etiology, or related factors, and there is limited evidence on its consequences.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of IDH according to different definitions in hemodialysis (HD) units, with different clinical practices and assessment of possible events after 18 months have passed.
Materials And Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 2 HD units, including all prevalent patients from March 2021 to September 2022.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
November 2024
Department of Medicine, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Crit Care
February 2025
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!