Background: Dexmedetomidine and propofol are commonly used sedative agents in non-invasive ventilation as they allow for easy arousal and are relatively well controllable. Moreover dexmedetomidine is associated with low risk of respiratory depression. However, both agents are associated with significant hemodynamic side effects. The primary objective of this study is to compare the influence of both drugs on hemodynamic effects in patients after thoracic surgical procedures receiving dexmedetomidine or propofol for noninvasive postoperative ventilation.
Methods: A prospective, randomised, observational study University Hospital. Interventions: Continuous sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol for six hours of postoperative non-invasive ventilation after thoracic surgery, with concomitant use of continuous epidural analgesia.
Results: A total of 38 patients (20 dexmedetomidine and 18 propofol) were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes of this study is that heart rate, systolic and mean arterial blood pressure did not differ significantly between the groups, but diastolic arterial blood pressure was significantly higher in propofol group. Comparison analysis of epinephrine usage did not reveal significant differences between the groups. Cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) analysis did not show significant differences between the groups, but there is a clear tendency of lower values of CO/CI in group receiving propofol. We also observed similar tendency in stroke volume index (SVI) and stroke volume variation (SVV) values, but also those differences did not reach statistical significance. Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) values were higher in propofol group, exceeding reference values, but similarly, the difference between the groups was not significant.
Conclusions: The main finding of this study is that dexmedetomidine and propofol provide similar advantages in haemodynamic stability during short-term sedation for non-invasive ventilation after thoracic surgical procedures in patients receiving continuous epidural analgesia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/AIT.a2018.0046 | DOI Listing |
Front Pharmacol
January 2025
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Purpose: The incidence of hemodynamic instability associated with dexmedetomidine (DEX) sedation has been reported to exceed 50%, with substantial inter-individual variability in response. Genetic factors have been suggested to contribute significantly to such variation. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical, pharmacokinetic, and genetic factors associated with DEX-induced hemodynamic instability in pediatric anesthesia patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Pharmacol Toxicol
January 2025
Department of general medicine, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos School of Clinical Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, 23 Yijinhuoluo West Street, Dongsheng District, Ordos, Inner Mongolia, 017000, PR China.
Objectives: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in elderly orthopedic surgery patients.
Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of dexmedetomidine in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. The data was published on October 25, 2024.
World Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Background: A rapid and smooth emergence is essential in patients undergoing trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgeries. Ketofol has been used as an anesthetic agent with good recovery characteristics. We conducted this study to compare the recovery profile of the patients receiving propofol-dexmedetomidine or ketofol-dexmedetomidine infusions for trans-sphenoidal excision of pituitary tumours.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Inflamm Res
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, ICU & Perioperative Medicine Hazm Mebaireek General Hospital HMC, Industrial Area Ar-Rayyan, Doha, Qatar.
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, propofol, and intralipid on lidocaine-induced cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity.
Methods: Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into six groups (n = 8 per group): control (C), lidocaine (L), lidocaine + dexmedetomidine (LD), lidocaine + midazolam (LM), lidocaine + propofol (LP), and lidocaine + intralipid (LI). Dexmedetomidine (100 µg/kg), midazolam (4 mg/kg), propofol (40 mg/kg), and intralipid (10 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally as pretreatment.
World J Biol Psychiatry
February 2025
Key laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, PR China.
Objective: We investigated the mechanism of Dexmedetomidine (Dex) in infant rats with brain injury.
Methods: The infant rats underwent brain injury modelling. The motor function, spatial learning and memory abilities in rats, and the hippocampal CA1 region Nissl body level and apoptosis were evaluated by behavioural tests and histological stainings.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!