The relationship between nonverbal communication and deception continues to attract much interest, but there are many misconceptions about it. In this review, we present a scientific view on this relationship. We describe theories explaining why liars would behave differently from truth tellers, followed by research on how liars actually behave and individuals' ability to detect lies. We show that the nonverbal cues to deceit discovered to date are faint and unreliable and that people are mediocre lie catchers when they pay attention to behavior. We also discuss why individuals hold misbeliefs about the relationship between nonverbal behavior and deception-beliefs that appear very hard to debunk. We further discuss the ways in which researchers could improve the state of affairs by examining nonverbal behaviors in different ways and in different settings than they currently do.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103135 | DOI Listing |
Am J Psychoanal
December 2024
, London, UK.
This essay was inspired by the experience of observing a newborn baby and the mother on a weekly basis for an entire year. I explore the receptive function of the maternal body whose mirroring acts created the intermediate area between her and her baby facilitating for what I call imitative playing. The concept of imitation came to mind because of its physicality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Child Psychol
January 2025
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
What motivates young children to produce early lies? A total of 217 2½- to 5-year-old children (M = 44.5 months, SD = 8.45; 54% girls; 61.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDyslexia
August 2024
Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Data Brief
February 2024
School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom.
Theory of mind (ToM) reasoning refers to the process by which we reason about the mental states (beliefs, desires, emotions) of others. Here, we describe an open dataset of responses from children who completed a story booklet task for assessing ToM reasoning ( = 321 3-12-year-old children, including 64 (neurotypical) children assessed longitudinally and 68 autistic children). Children completed one of two versions of the story booklet task (Booklet 1 or 2).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!