A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Development and Validation of a PACER Prediction Equation for VOpeak in 10- to 15-Year-Old Youth. | LitMetric

Previous progressive aerobic cardiovascular endurance run (PACER) equations were developed to estimate peak oxygen consumption (VOpeak) from data collected during treadmill running. No equation has been developed using VOpeak assessed during the PACER. To develop and validate a prediction equation to estimate VOpeak from the PACER in 10- to 15-year-olds. A sample of 163 youth were recruited to develop (n = 101) and validate (n = 62) a prediction equation. VOpeak was measured using a portable metabolic unit. Regression analysis yielded a prediction equation that included laps, body mass index, and interaction between sex and age. Correlations and repeated-measures analysis of variances were used to compare the measured and estimated VOpeak from the new Scott et al equation and 2 commonly used FitnessGram™ (Mahar et al 2011 and Mahar et al 2018) equations, and the impact of sex on predicted VOpeak. Predicted VOpeak from the Mahar et al 2011 and 2018 equations was significantly lower compared with measured values, and the Scott et al prediction was not different. The Mahar et al 2018 equation tended to overestimate VOpeak in males but worked well for females. The Mahar et al 2011 and Scott et al equations revealed no sex differences. The Scott et al equation resulted in a more accurate estimate of VOpeak, performing equally well for both sexes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/pes.2018-0136DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mahar et al
20
prediction equation
16
scott et al
16
et al 2011
12
vopeak
10
et al
9
equation
8
equation vopeak
8
estimate vopeak
8
et al equation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!