Aims And Introduction: We aimed to explore concomitant orally administered antidiabetic agent (OAD) regimens used in basal supported oral therapy (BOT) with insulin glargine in a real-life setting, and to assess the efficacy and safety of each regimen using data from the Add-on Lantus to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents 2 study, a 24-week observational study in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.

Materials And Methods: Among 1629 insulin-naïve patients who had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value of ≥6.5 % during the previous 4 weeks and were treated with BOT during the observational period, 1227 patients who retained the same concomitant OAD regimens throughout the period were included in the analysis.

Results: Sulfonylurea (71.5 %), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i; 60.7 %), and biguanide (BG; 48.6 %) were commonly administered OADs in BOT. The HbA1c level decreased in patients taking BG alone (-2.76 %) and DPP-4i alone (-2.46 %). Of the three OADs, mean doses of the most frequently administered OAD changed from baseline to the final evaluation point: 2.5-2.3 mg for glimepiride, 59.1-58.7 mg for sitagliptin, and 1145.6-1168.2 mg for metformin. No significant difference in the hypoglycemia incidence rate was found between regimens ( = 0.3765), with incidence rates of 1.9 % (DPP-4i alone) to 7.0 % (other regimens) observed.

Conclusions: DPP-4i plays a major role in BOT with insulin glargine in a real-life setting. The incidence of hypoglycemia did not differ significantly between BOT regimens, including DPP-4i. Insulin glargine added to DPP-4i is a potential therapeutic approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224995PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13340-015-0250-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

insulin glargine
16
bot insulin
12
glargine real-life
12
oad regimens
12
efficacy safety
8
basal supported
8
supported oral
8
oral therapy
8
therapy bot
8
concomitant orally
8

Similar Publications

Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine for Glycemic Control in Critical Illness Hyperglycemia.

Indian J Crit Care Med

January 2025

Department of Anaesthesia, ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Aim And Background: Hyperglycemia is a serious condition and associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality in both critically ill and non-critically ill people. Improvement in the glycemic level reduces the length of hospital stay, systemic infections and short- and long-term mortality. The aim was to test the effectiveness of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine and regular insulin in controlling blood sugar in patients with critical hyperglycemia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This case report presents a rare instance of a 28-year-old female patient with insulin-induced abdominal lipodystrophy, who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of an anxiety attack triggered by body image distress. She was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of eight years. For the past 10 years, she has been using insulin glargine and insulin lispro, injecting roughly five times per day.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: This study assessed efficacy and safety of the fixed ratio combination iGlarLixi 100/33 (insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide 33 μg/mL) in people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) in daily clinical practice.

Materials And Methods: This non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, single-arm 24-week study documented PwT2D with an HbA1c of 7.5%-10.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diabetes mellitus represents a significant and growing global health challenge, with its prevalence steadily increasing. Insulin therapy remains a cornerstone of diabetes management. Since its discovery in 1921, insulin has undergone substantial advancements, evolving from crude animal extracts to highly refined recombinant formulations and biosimilars.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cell-Based Assays to Detect Innate Immune Response Modulating Impurities: Application to Biosimilar Insulin.

AAPS J

December 2024

Laboratory of Immunology, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Research Division-IV, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

Characterizing and mitigating factors that impact product immunogenicity can aid in risk assessment and/or managing risk following manufacturing changes. For follow-on products that have the same indication, patient population, and active product ingredient, the residual immunogenicity risk resides predominantly on differences in product and process related impurities. Characterizing differences in innate immune modulating impurities (IIRMI), which could act as adjuvants by activating local antigen presenting cells (APCs), can inform the immunogenicity risk assessment potentially reducing the need for clinical trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!