Anesthesiologist Specialization and Use of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

Anesthesiology

From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (B.T.C., M.B.L-F., R.C.M., O.C.O., M.D.N) Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.K.S.), Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and the Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania (B.T.C., M.B.L-F., M.D.N.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Published: February 2019

Background: Guidelines for obstetric anesthesia recommend neuraxial anesthesia (i.e., spinal or epidural block) for cesarean delivery in most patients. Little is known about the association of anesthesiologist specialization in obstetric anesthesia with a patient's likelihood of receiving general anesthesia. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare utilization of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery among patients treated by generalist versus obstetric-specialized anesthesiologists.

Methods: The authors studied patients undergoing cesarean delivery for live singleton pregnancies from 2013 through 2017 at one academic medical center. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record. The authors estimated the association of anesthesiologist specialization in obstetric anesthesia with the odds of receiving general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Results: Of the cesarean deliveries in our sample, 2,649 of 4,052 (65.4%) were performed by obstetric-specialized anesthesiologists, and 1,403 of 4,052 (34.6%) by generalists. Use of general anesthesia differed for patients treated by specialists and generalists (7.3% vs. 12.1%; P < 0.001). After adjustment, the odds of receiving general anesthesia were lower among patients treated by obstetric-specialized anesthesiologists among all patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92; P = 0.011), and in a subgroup analysis restricted to urgent or emergent cesarean deliveries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.99; P = 0.049). There was no association between provider specialization and the odds of receiving general anesthesia in a subgroup analysis restricted to evening or weekend deliveries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.03; P = 0.085).

Conclusions: Treatment by an obstetric anesthesiologist was associated with lower odds of receiving general anesthesia for cesarean delivery; however, this finding did not persist in a subgroup analysis restricted to evening and weekend deliveries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002534DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general anesthesia
32
cesarean delivery
20
receiving general
20
anesthesia cesarean
16
odds receiving
16
anesthesiologist specialization
12
anesthesia
12
obstetric anesthesia
12
patients treated
12
adjusted odds
12

Similar Publications

Objectives: Admission to ICU is associated with long-term consequences for the survivors. The study explores whether Danish ICU survivors remain employed after ICU discharge.

Design: A longitudinal register study of 16,284 Danish ICU survivors 25-67 years old 1:1 sex- and age-matched with general population references.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

June 2024

Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation for maintaining extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in people of all ages with cardiac or respiratory failure, or both.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In children, monitoring depth of anesthesia is challenging because of the still developing brain. Electroencephalographic density spectral array monitoring provides age- and anesthetic drug-specific electroencephalographic patterns, making it suitable for use in children. Yet, not much is known about the benefits of using density spectral array on post-operative recovery in children.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!