Dental Educators' Perceptions of Educational Learning Domains.

J Dent Educ

Eileen R. Hoskin is Director, Division of Operative Dentistry, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine; David C. Johnsen is Dean, University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; Yun Saksena is Associate Dean for Education and Associate Professor, Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry; Zsuzsa Horvath is Assistant Professor and Director of Faculty Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine; Tracy de Peralta is Clinical Associate Professor, University of Michigan School of Dentistry; Neal Fleisher is Clinical Professor of General Dentistry, Director of Predoctoral Periodontology, and Director of Faculty Development, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University; Teresa A. Marshall is Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; and Cataldo Leone is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Periodontology, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University.

Published: January 2019

The aim of this study was to seek the views of a national sample of dental educators regarding the importance of learning domains in dental education, their defined outcomes of those domains, and their perceived effectiveness of their schools in guiding learning in those domains. The study defined the educational domains important for training future dentists as knowledge, technical skills, critical thinking, ethics, social responsibility, and interprofessional education/practice (IPE/IPP). A survey of members of the American Dental Education Association (ADEA) Special Interest Group on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning was conducted in 2017. In addition to reporting their demographics, participants were asked to rate and rank the importance of each learning domain as well as answer open-ended questions. Of the 89 respondents (response rate 12.5%), 31% were course directors, and 48% had been dental faculty members for more than ten years. Knowledge was ranked as the most important domain, followed by critical thinking, technical skills, clinical decision making, ethics, problem-solving, social responsibility, and finally IPE/IPP. When rating the absolute importance of these domains in the training of dental students, the respondents gave all but IPE/IPP and social responsibility the highest rating. Knowledge and technical skills were rated highest for respondents' confidence in defining student outcomes with similar high ratings for their confidence in guiding this learning. There was little consensus concerning a definition of critical thinking, and a third of the respondents were uncertain of specific learning outcomes for it. Participants expressed even less confidence in defining outcomes for ethics, IPE/IPP, and social responsibility. This baseline information will be used for a future in-depth study to aid in the development of strategies for articulating outcomes, guiding learning, and assessing performance in U.S. dental schools.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21815/JDE.019.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

social responsibility
16
learning domains
12
guiding learning
12
technical skills
12
critical thinking
12
learning
8
dental education
8
domains training
8
knowledge technical
8
ipe/ipp social
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!