There is no concordance between current diagnostic criteria for failure to thrive (FTT). We analyzed validity of the Semi-Objective Failure to Thrive (SOFTT) diagnosis tool, which uses a combination of subjective and objective components to make the diagnosis of FTT. The tool was used to diagnose FTT in 94 patients who met 1 of 7 accepted criteria for FTT. Concurrent and predictive validity were demonstrated using anthropometric z-scores and change in anthropometric z-scores, respectively. SOFTT results correlated with differences in anthropometric z-scores for length ( P = .011), weight, weight-for-length, body mass index, mid-upper arm circumference, and triceps skinfold thickness ( P < .0001) between those diagnosed as normal and those with FTT. At follow-up, children with FTT compared with children rated as normal had significantly higher change in weight ( P ≤ .001) and body mass index ( P = .026) z-scores. The SOFTT tool leads to the accurate diagnosis of FTT demonstrated by concurrent and predictive validity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009922818821891DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

failure thrive
12
anthropometric z-scores
12
diagnosis tool
8
diagnosis ftt
8
concurrent predictive
8
predictive validity
8
z-scores softt
8
body mass
8
ftt
7
defining pediatric
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!