A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validity of a visual scoring method using gummy jelly for evaluating chewing efficiency in a large-scale epidemiological survey. | LitMetric

Background: Several methods exist for objectively evaluating chewing efficiency by using gummy jelly. However, the validity of the subjective visual evaluation of chewing efficiency has not been assessed.

Objective: To verify with an epidemiological study, the validity of a visual scoring method using gummy jelly by testing the relationship between masticatory performance (MP) using a fully automatic measuring system and visual score (VS) using a visual scoring method.

Methods: Community-dwelling elderly individuals (n = 1234) ≥70 years old participated. One evaluator measured VS consecutively after participants chewed the gummy jelly (ie, actual-VS). The chewed jelly was photographed. Two evaluators used the photograph to measure the gummy jelly (ie, photo-VS). To test the validity of both methods, the correlation between actual-VS and MP and between photo-VS and MP were analysed. Inter-rater reliability between the evaluators of photo-VS was analysed.

Results: Significant correlations existed between actual-VS and MP and between photo-VS and MP (r = 0.86-0.87; P < 0.001). The intra-class correlation coefficient of the inter-rater reliability for photo-VS was very high (0.93; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.877-0.953); however, the distribution of photo-VS deviated slightly from the actual-VS. A large coefficient of variation in the MP for low VSs suggested the influence of incomplete comminution, which was not reflected by the VS, and the accidental swallowing of small pieces during chewing.

Conclusion: The VS deviated slightly from the MP calculated using a fully automated method; however, the VS can be utilised for epidemiological surveys with numerous participants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.12761DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gummy jelly
20
visual scoring
12
chewing efficiency
12
validity visual
8
scoring method
8
method gummy
8
evaluating chewing
8
actual-vs photo-vs
8
jelly
6
gummy
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!