AI Article Synopsis

  • * It raises ongoing debates about the true definition of death, questioning whether it's based on biological failure, neurological injury, or social constructs.
  • * Leading experts in the field contribute to the discussion, reflecting on decades of engagement with these complex ethical and medical issues.

Article Abstract

This special report is published in commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the "Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death," a landmark document that proposed a new way to define death, with implications that advanced the field of organ transplantation. This remarkable success notwithstanding, the concept has raised lasting questions about what it means to be dead. Is death defined in terms of the biological failure of the organism to maintain integrated functioning? Can death be declared on the basis of severe neurological injury even when biological functions remain intact? Is death essentially a social construct that can be defined in different ways, based on human judgment? These issues, and more, are discussed and debated in this report by leading experts in the field, many of whom have been engaged with this topic for decades.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hast.942DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brain death
4
death fifty
4
fifty exploring
4
exploring consensus
4
consensus controversy
4
controversy contexts
4
contexts special
4
special report
4
report published
4
published commemoration
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!