AI Article Synopsis

  • Peer review is essential for improving quality in radiology, covering aspects like diagnostic interpretations and patient safety events.
  • A just culture promotes a nonpunitive environment for evaluating errors, focusing on prevention rather than blame, which helps foster continuous improvement in safety.
  • The authors discuss how to implement a just culture in an academic radiology setting, using case examples to illustrate its application in various areas, including interpretive and procedural tasks.

Article Abstract

Peer review is a cornerstone of quality improvement programs and serves to support the peer learning process. Peer review in radiology incorporates the review of diagnostic imaging interpretation, interventional procedures, communication, and the evaluation of untoward patient events. A just culture is an environment in which errors and near-miss events are evaluated in a deliberately nonpunitive framework, avoiding a culture of blame and responsibility and focusing instead on error prevention and fostering a culture of continuous quality improvement. Adoption of a just culture requires careful attention to detail and relies on continuous coaching of individuals and teams to ensure future systems improvements and a culture of safety. The authors describe the practical implementation of a just culture framework for peer review in an academic radiology department and highlight its application to interpretive, noninterpretive, and procedural domains through case examples.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peer review
16
practical implementation
8
quality improvement
8
culture
7
peer
5
review
5
culture practical
4
implementation radiologist
4
radiologist peer
4
review peer
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!