Background: As defined by World Health Organization (WHO), an antibody level of ≥ 10mIU/mL to hepatitis B virus confers protection. With the launching of Abbott anti-HBs assay re-standardized to the 2 WHO International Reference Preparation, a positive bias in antibody level would be anticipated. Manufacturer provides limited data for samples around the immune cut-off which has potential implication on vaccine guidance.

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the re-standardized Abbott Architect anti-HBs assay and to determine the impact of the upward shift.

Study Design: A total of 52 samples, including 12 external quality assurance programme samples and 40 clinical samples were tested with both the Abbott 1 WHO standardized and the 2 WHO re-standardized assay and results compared. The 2 WHO anti-HBs standard and Acometrix anti-HBs control were also included for comparison.

Results: Verification of the re-standardized assay with the 2 WHO anti-HBs standard revealed positive bias with mean closer to target value. Overall, the positive bias introduced by the new assay will only affect interpretation of samples with anti-HBs levels > 5.00 to < 10.00 mIU/mL previously tested on the Abbott 1 WHO standardized anti-HBs assay.

Conclusions: Final interpretation of immune status to hepatitis B was not affected by the upward shift following introduction of the new Abbott anti-HBs assay except for previously negative samples with anti-HBs levels between >5.00 to <10.00 mIU/mL.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2018.12.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-hbs assay
16
positive bias
12
anti-hbs
10
re-standardized abbott
8
abbott architect
8
architect anti-hbs
8
antibody level
8
abbott anti-hbs
8
tested abbott
8
abbott standardized
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!