A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Is there a role for low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in delayed or nonunion following arthrodesis in foot and ankle surgery? | LitMetric

Is there a role for low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in delayed or nonunion following arthrodesis in foot and ankle surgery?

Foot Ankle Surg

Foot and Ankle Unit, Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr, Ystrad Fawr Way, Ystrad Mynach, Hengoed CF82 7EP, United Kingdom.

Published: December 2019

Background: Delayed union and nonunion following foot and ankle arthrodesis is a disabling complication for patients. There are no clinical studies looking at whether there is a role for use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) following this. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of LIPUS in this cohort of patients in our centre.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study reviewing the use of LIPUS in patients who had arthrodesis of a number of different foot and ankle joints diagnosed with delayed or non-union.

Results: Over a 5year period, 18 patients (71st MTPJ fusion, 2 subtalar joints, 2 triple fusion, 4 ankle fusions and 3 isolated midfoot joint) with radiologically confirmed delayed union, were treated with a standardised LIPUS therapy. Twelve patients (67%) were treated successfully with full radiological union confirmed. 4 patients required further surgical revision surgery while 2 were treated conservatively. Isolated small foot joints demonstrated a higher incidence of fusion (9/10; 90%) after LIPUS in comparison to larger or multiple joint arthrodesis (3/8; 38%).

Conclusions: There may be a role for the use of LIPUS as a treatment option in delayed union of isolated, small foot joint arthrodesis. However, we would not recommend its use in large or multiple F&A joint arthrodesis. Large multicentre series are required to confirm our findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.11.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foot ankle
12
delayed union
12
joint arthrodesis
12
pulsed ultrasound
8
ultrasound lipus
8
isolated small
8
small foot
8
lipus
7
arthrodesis
6
patients
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!