AI Article Synopsis

  • In Japan, most kidney transplants involve living related donors, and third-party interviews are conducted to ensure that donors are making voluntary decisions.
  • A study analyzed 446 living donor candidates, identifying factors for those who withdrew their donation decision after interviews, with 11 individuals in the withdrawal group.
  • Six key reasons for withdrawal emerged, including concerns about pregnancy risks, alternative treatments, physical burden on the donor, the recipient's behavior, the need for more time, and feelings of psychological pressure.
  • The study emphasizes the importance of understanding each donor's situation and providing them enough information and time to safeguard their right to refuse.

Article Abstract

Background: In Japan, 90% of kidney transplantations involve living related donors. A third-party interview is conducted during latter stages of preparation for transplantation to ensure the donor's voluntary decision-making. In this study, we investigated the factors responsible for withdrawal of decision for kidney donation by related living donors after third-party interview.

Methods: Related living donor candidates were divided into 2 groups based on their final decision: those who finally donated the kidney (FDG; n = 435); and those who withdrew their decision after third-party interview (WG; n = 11). The psychosocial and medical variables were compared and the reasons for withdrawal were investigated.

Results: Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that none of the variables were significantly related to WG. Six categories of reasons for withdrawal were identified: "avoiding pregnancy risk"; "selecting alternative treatment"; "avoiding physical burden for donor"; "recipients' intemperance"; "need to take more time for decision-making"; and "psychological pressure."

Conclusion: A certain number of donor candidates withdrew their decision for different reasons, even in the latter stages of the transplant preparation. Careful verification of the donor candidates' individual situation and provision of adequate information and time are important to protect the donor's right to refuse.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.06.031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

living donors
12
withdrawal decision
8
donors third-party
8
third-party interview
8
donor candidates
8
withdrew decision
8
reasons withdrawal
8
withdrawal
4
decision donate
4
kidney
4

Similar Publications

Background: Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) affects outcomes in liver transplantation (LT). Existing risk models developed for deceased-donor LT depend on posttransplant factors and fall short in living-donor LT (LDLT), where pretransplant evaluations are crucial for preventing EAD and justifying the donor's risks.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 2944 adult patients who underwent LDLT at 17 centers between 2016 and 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sucrose-preferring gut microbes prevent host obesity by producing exopolysaccharides.

Nat Commun

January 2025

Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.

Commensal bacteria affect host health by producing various metabolites from dietary carbohydrates via bacterial glycometabolism; however, the underlying mechanism of action remains unclear. Here, we identified Streptococcus salivarius as a unique anti-obesity commensal bacterium. We found that S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: KEPs (kidney exchange programs) facilitate living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT) for patients with incompatible donors, who are typically higher risk than non-KEP patients because of higher sensitization and longer dialysis vintage. We conducted a comparative analysis of graft outcomes and risk factors for both KEP and non-KEP living donor kidney transplants.

Methods: All LDKTs performed in the Netherlands between 2004-2021 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Multiple intraoperative hemodynamic parameters are associated with an increased risk of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, there is significant center-to-center variability in terms of which parameters are used. We sought to determine which intraoperative hemodynamic parameters are most predictive of EAD following LDLT.

Methods: This is a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023409711).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by protein aggregates mostly consisting of misfolded alpha-synuclein (αSyn). Progressive degeneration of midbrain dopaminergic neurons (mDANs) and nigrostriatal projections results in severe motor symptoms. While the preferential loss of mDANs has not been fully understood yet, the cell type-specific vulnerability has been linked to a unique intracellular milieu, influenced by dopamine metabolism, high demand for mitochondrial activity, and increased level of oxidative stress (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!