AI Article Synopsis

  • Peripheral veno-arterial extra corporeal life support (V-A ECLS) is effective for treating refractory cardiogenic shock, but complications like insufficient left ventricular unloading can occur even with the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump.
  • A study reviewing 31 critical patients treated with both V-A ECLS and Impella from 2011 to 2015 showed a 53% survival rate at 30 days, with chronic heart failure being a significant risk factor for mortality.
  • The combination of Impella and V-A ECLS appears beneficial for patients with severe symptoms and could aid in the transition to long-term heart support or heart transplantation.

Article Abstract

Peripheral veno-arterial extra corporeal life support (V-A ECLS) is an effective tool in treating refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). Despite additional use of intra-aortic balloon pump, insufficient left ventricular unloading is a likely complication. We present herein our experience combining V-A ECLS and Impella to treat symptomatic, critical patients. A retrospective single-center review analyzed patients with V-A ECLS and intra-aortic balloon pump for RCS and subsequently benefiting from Impella implantation, between 2011 and 2015. From 1248 cases, 31 critical patients (2.5%) with a median SOFA score = 12 (7-15) were included. Median age was 53 years, and 74% were male. RCS resulted from myocardial ischemia (52%) and idiopathic dilated myocardiopathy (23%). Forty-seven percentage of patients were treated previously for chronic Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Median time between V-A ECLS and Impella implantation was 84 hours (24-186). The Impella median support duration was 8 days (5-10). ECLS and Impella were weaned simultaneously in 26% of patients, 33% were switched to a long-term assistance, and 10% were transplanted. Overall, day-30 survival was 53%. Factors including diabetes, patients aged over 60 years, surgery using extracorporeal circulation, adrenalin infusion, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic HFrEF are associated with day-30 mortality. Chronic HFrEF was an independent risk factor for the day-30 mortality [hazard ratio = 5.28 (1.38-20.21), P = 0.015]. Impella and V-A ECLS combination is a promising association for critical patients presenting symptomatic insufficient LV unloading, for weaning V-A ECLS or testing the right ventricle before a switch to left ventricle assist device support.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000000922DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

v-a ecls
24
ecls impella
12
critical patients
12
peripheral veno-arterial
8
veno-arterial extra
8
extra corporeal
8
corporeal life
8
life support
8
intra-aortic balloon
8
balloon pump
8

Similar Publications

We describe, to our knowledge, the first use in Dubai of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in a patient who suffered intraoperative cardiac arrest due to presumed cardiac channelopathy. A 40-year-old patient presented for open myomectomy surgery. She had no other medical problems apart from obesity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of complications on survival outcomes in different temporary mechanical circulatory support techniques: A large retrospective cohort study of cardiac surgical and nonsurgical patients.

J Heart Lung Transplant

December 2024

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Background: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has become a standard treatment in cardiogenic shock but is associated with high complication rates. This study analyzes common complications associated with modern tMCS devices and their impact on mortality depending on the tMCS approach.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients with all-cause cardiogenic shock treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal life support, microaxial flow pump, and a combination of both (ECMELLA).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (V-A ECLS) is increasingly being utilized for postcardiotomy shock (PCS), though data describing the relationship between type of indexed operation and outcomes are limited. This study compared V-A ECLS outcomes across four major cardiovascular surgical procedures.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients who required V-A ECLS for PCS between 2015 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparing Outcomes of Post-Cardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock Patients: On-Site Cannulation vs. Retrieval for V-A ECMO Support.

J Clin Med

May 2024

Specialty Critical Care, Advanced Cardiac Care and Acute Circulatory Support, Nazih Zuhdi Transplant Institute, Integris Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.

Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) remains a life-threatening complication after cardiac surgery. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents the mainstay of mechanical circulatory support for PCCS; however, its availability is limited to larger experienced centers, leading to a mismatch between centers performing cardiac surgery and hospitals offering ECMO management beyond cannulation. We sought to evaluate the outcomes and complications of PCCS patients requiring veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO cannulated at our hospital compared to those cannulated at referral hospitals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Left Ventricular Unloading in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Clinical Perspective Derived from Basic Cardiovascular Physiology.

Curr Cardiol Rep

July 2024

Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Center, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522, NH, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Purpose Of Review: To present an abridged overview of the literature and pathophysiological background of adjunct interventional left ventricular unloading strategies during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO). From a clinical perspective, the mechanistic complexity of such combined mechanical circulatory support often requires in-depth physiological reasoning at the bedside, which remains a cornerstone of daily practice for optimal patient-specific V-A ECMO care.

Recent Findings: Recent conventional clinical trials have not convincingly shown the superiority of V-A ECMO in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock as compared with medical therapy alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!