[Critical doctors and cognitive bias].

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

Gold Coast University Hospital, dep. Emergency Medicine, Southport, Australië.

Published: December 2018

A doctor with good critical thinking skills will intervene when required, but abstain from intervening wherever possible. He or she has the ability to apply resource stewardship, acknowledges the limitations of guidelines and is able to deviate from protocols when appropriate, with sound arguments for why this is in the patient's best interest. We believe that critical thinking is an important skill for any doctor, and that it will contribute to better patient-centred outcomes at lower societal costs and with greater job satisfaction among healthcare professionals. The current medical curriculum for medical students and doctors in specialty training in the Netherlands highlights several aspects (e.g. evidence-based medicine, shared decision making, cost awareness) that are required if the student is to become a critically thinking doctor. This focus should, however, be further emphasized, and should include knowledge of cognitive bias and the skills required for the critical thinking process. On the basis of three patient vignettes several forms of cognitive bias are described, along with bias-mitigation strategies.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

critical thinking
12
cognitive bias
8
[critical doctors
4
doctors cognitive
4
cognitive bias]
4
bias] doctor
4
doctor good
4
good critical
4
thinking
4
thinking skills
4

Similar Publications

In three studies (total N = 622), the effects of threat to control on subsequent moral judgement were examined. After recalling a lack-of-control experience, participants evaluated the morality of a protagonist's decisions in a series of incongruent moral dilemmas. We found that a control-threatening reminder made moral judgements more utilitarian on the deontological-utilitarian dimension, which is consistent with the control motivation theory.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Results of the National Lung Screening Trial create the potential to reduce lung cancer mortality, but community translation of lung cancer screening (LCS) has been challenging. Subsequent policies have endorsed informed and shared decision-making and using decision support tools to support person-centered choices about screening to facilitate implementation. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of LuCaS CHOICES, a web-based decision aid to support delivery of accurate information, facilitate communication skill development, and clarify personal preferences regarding LCS-a key component of high-quality LCS implementation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Strategic knowledge mobilization efforts are needed to enhance uptake and use of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines (24HMG), which describe optimal amounts of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep each day for overall health. The Whole Day Matters Toolkit for Primary Care is an evidence-informed resource to help primary care providers (PCPs) disseminate the 24HMGs. The purpose of this study was to describe gaining consensus on toolkit components through iterative revisions to improve its utility in preparation for the September 2022 launch, and to summarize early dissemination efforts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study evaluated the effects of a critical reflection program utilizing the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) reflective questions based on the Clinical Judgment Model (CJM) on newly graduated nurses' clinical judgment skills. A total of 153 newly graduated nurses scheduled for on-site training in a ward nursing unit were divided into a control group (receiving only the usual on-site training with preceptorship) and an experimental group (receiving the developed program with the same on-site training with preceptorship as the control group). Data were collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months after the intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The present research examined cultural differences in interpersonal memories and forecasts, situated in a currently salient positive or negative interpersonal context. We found that a negative focal event, compared to a positive one, led to more negative memories and forecasts of interpersonal encounters. The effect was stronger among Euro-Canadians than among Chinese.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!