A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Simplified Luminal Water Imaging for the Detection of Prostate Cancer From Multiecho T MR Images. | LitMetric

Background: Luminal water imaging (LWI) suffers less from imaging artifacts than the diffusion-weighted imaging used in multiparametric MRI of the prostate. LWI obtains multicompartment tissue information from a multiecho T dataset.

Purpose: To compare a simplified LWI technique with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in classifying lesions based on groupings of PI-RADS v2 scores. Secondary aims were to investigate whether LWI differentiates between histologically confirmed tumor and normal tissue as effectively as ADC, and whether LWI is correlated with the multicompartment parameters of the vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumors (VERDICT) diffusion model.

Study Type: A subset of a larger prospective study.

Population: In all, 65 male patients aged 49-79 were scanned.

Field Strength/sequence: A 32-echo T and a six b-value diffusion sequence (0, 90, 500, 1500, 2000, 3000 s/mm ) at 3T.

Assessment: Regions of interest were placed by a board-certified radiologist in areas of lesion and benign tissue and given PI-RADS v2 scores.

Statistical Tests: Receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results: LWI classifies tissue as PI-RADS 1,2 or PI-RADS 3,4,5 with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.779, compared with 0.764 for ADC. LWI differentiated histologically confirmed malignant from nonmalignant tissue with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity values of 0.81, 75%, and 87%, compared with 0.75, 83%, and 67% for ADC. The microstructural basis of the LWI technique is further suggested by the correspondence with the VERDICT diffusion-based microstructural imaging technique, with α, A , A , and LWF showing significant correlations.

Data Conclusion: LWI alone can predict PI-RADS v2 score groupings and detect histologically confirmed tumors with an ability similar to ADC alone without the limitations of diffusion-weighted MRI. This is important, given that ADC has an advantage in these tests as it already informs PI-RADS v2 scoring. LWI also provides multicompartment information that has an explicit biophysical interpretation, unlike ADC.

Level Of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:910-917.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767562PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26608DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

histologically confirmed
12
lwi
10
luminal water
8
water imaging
8
lwi technique
8
adc lwi
8
tissue pi-rads
8
imaging
6
adc
6
pi-rads
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!