Risk of extrapelvine vascular injuries in osteosynthesis with gliding hip screws.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Department of Traumatology and Sports Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

Published: March 2019

Background: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) osteosynthesis represents one of the most frequently performed fixation methods in orthopedic practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential risk of vascular damage by DHS side-plate screws (PS) and plunging instruments for individual femoral vessels and screw positions.

Methods: In ten hemipelvic/leg specimens mounted with a large femur distractor, a DHS system with a four-hole side-plate was inserted. PS were inserted in 3 consecutive courses with different inclinations in the frontal plane of 0° (group 1), - 30° posterior (group 2) and + 30° anterior (group 3) in relation to the side-plate's surface, resulting in 120 PS positions. After screw tightening, the soft tissues on the medial side of the femur were dissected and investigated for vascular compromise; in each course, the effect of overshot instruments within a range of 50 mm beyond the side-plate's surface was also tested.

Results: Totally, 37/120 screw positions (31%) revealed potential vascular compromise which comprised of 15/120 (13%) direct hits by screw tips and 22/120 (18%) potential impacts by plunging instruments. The deep femoral artery system (DFA) was significantly (p = 0.007) most often affected but no significant differences for individual vascular structures were seen. Direct vascular impacts occurred significantly more often (p = 0.0047) in screws with 0° inclination compared to + 30° inclination (p = 0.017). Significant differences among individual screw positions were only found in group - 30° with direct vessel contacts (p = 0.038).

Conclusions: The DFA system is significantly more at risk while significant preference of a certain vessel is missing. Our data indicate that more than 30% of 120 screw positions in DHS osteosynthesis revealed a potential danger of vascular compromise, when surgical principles are denied in hip fracture fixation.

Clinical Relevance: Though vascular complications are infrequently encountered in DHS osteosynthesis they have to be considered as a potential complication when surgical principles are not followed in this anatomic area.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3077-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dhs osteosynthesis
12
vascular compromise
12
screw positions
12
vascular
8
plunging instruments
8
group - 30°
8
side-plate's surface
8
revealed potential
8
differences individual
8
surgical principles
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To examine the association of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) with bone mineral density T-value (BMDT) in middle-aged and elderly patients suffering from hip fractures.

Methods: Clinical data were collected from 110 patients with hip fractures who underwent internal fixation surgery between October 2020 and June 2021. Patients treated with DHS were included in the control group, and those treated with PFNA were classified into the observation group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Extracapsular hip fractures are routinely treated with fixation, and the majority heal without complication. The fixation fails in a minority of cases, typically either by 'cutting out' of the superior femoral head or through breakage of the metalwork following non-union. In such cases, if operative treatment is thought appropriate, there are two major treatment options: revision fixation of the fracture or joint replacement surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of primary cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty with proximal femoral nail (PFN) osteosynthesis as a management modality in unstable fractures of the intertrochanteric femur.

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures also referred to as extracapsular fractures occur in the area between the greater and lesser trochanters. Osteosynthesis is a prompt and efficient method for managing stable intertrochanteric fractures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gotfried positive reduction offers an alternative strategy for femoral neck fracture (FNF) when achieving anatomical reduction is challenging. However, the biomechanical consequences of positive reduction remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of positive reduction across different Pauwels classification, providing a reference for quantifying positive reduction in clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Closed reduction and dynamic hip screw (DHS) osteosynthesis are preferred as joint-preserving therapy in case of medial femoral neck fractures (MFNFs). A change in the femoral offset (CFO) can cause gait abnormality, impingement, or greater trochanteric pain syndrome. It is unknown whether the femoral offset (FO) can be postoperatively fully restored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!