The Evaluation of Serum Biomarkers for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Diagnosis.

Front Physiol

Bioinformatics Core, Department of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, United States.

Published: November 2018

Lung cancer ranks top in the cause of cancer death globally. The identification of effective biomarkers is essential for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis. The expression levels of prolactin (PRL), CEA, and CYFR21 in serum were assayed by ELISA. The blood samples were attained from 44 NSCLC cases and 44 healthy controls. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were applied to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy and create diagnostic mathematical models. Serum PRL, CEA, and CYFR21 levels were significantly higher in patients with NSCLC than the healthy controls (all -values <0.001). According to the model to predict NSCLC patients from the healthy controls, a combination of PRL, CEA, and CYFR21 biomarkers was more effective than individual biomarker alone, with AUC = 0.960 (95% CI: 0.921-0.999), sensitivity = 0.909, specificity = 0.955, positive predicted value = 0.952, and negative predicted value = 0.913. Prolactin can be used as a potential serum biomarker for the diagnosis of NSCLC. A panel of PRL, CEA, and CYFRA21 was found as promising serum biomarkers for the diagnosis of NSCLC with relatively high sensitivity and specificity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6281717PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01710DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
12
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
cancer nsclc
8
nsclc diagnosis
8
prl cea
8
cea cyfr21
8
healthy controls
8
evaluation serum
4
serum biomarkers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!