Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

Childs Nerv Syst

Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, room G03.124, 3484 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Published: September 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study highlights complications following pediatric cranioplasty, particularly focusing on the frequent issue of bone flap resorption after craniectomy.
  • Data was collected from 64 children across multiple hospitals, evaluating factors such as surgery details and postoperative outcomes, including infection and disfigurement.
  • Results indicated that while autologous bone re-implantation had a high rate of resorption, cranial implants showed lower morbidity and reoperation rates, suggesting implants might be a preferable option in pediatric cases.

Article Abstract

Objective: Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after craniectomy with either autologous bone flaps or cranial implants are reported to be common, particularly bone flap resorption. However, only sparse data are available regarding cranioplasty strategies, complications, and outcomes. This manuscript describes a Canadian-Dutch multicenter pediatric cohort study with autografts and cranial implant cranioplasties following craniectomies for a variety of indications.

Methods: The study included all children (< 18 years) who underwent craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty surgeries from 2008 to 2014 (with a minimum of 1-year follow-up) at four academic hospitals with a dedicated pediatric neurosurgical service. Data were collected regarding initial diagnosis, age, time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, bone flap storage method, type of cranioplasty for initial procedure (and redo if applicable), and the postoperative outcome including surgical site infection, wound breakdowns, bone flap resorption, and inadequate fit/disfigurement.

Results: Sixty-four patients (46 males, average age 9.7 ± 5.5 years) were eligible for inclusion, with mean follow-up of 82.3 ± 31.2 months after craniectomy. Forty cranioplasties (62.5%) used autologous bone re-implant, 23 (57.5%) of which showed resorption. On average, resorption was documented at 434 days (range 62-2796 days) after reimplantation. In 20 cases, a revision cranioplasty was needed. In 24 of the post-craniectomy cases (37.5%), a cranial implant was used with one of ten different implant types. Implant loosening prompted a complete revision cranioplasty in 2 cases (8.3%). Cranial implants were associated with low morbidity and lower reoperation dates compared to the autologous cranioplasties.

Conclusion: The most prominent finding in this multicenter cohort study was that bone flap resorption in children remains a common and widespread problem following craniectomy. Cranioplasty strategies varied between centers and evolved over time within centers. Cranial implants were associated with low morbidity and low reoperation rates. Still, longer term and prospective multicenter cohort studies are needed to optimize cranioplasty strategies in children after craniectomies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-018-4024-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cranioplasties craniectomies
8
cohort study
8
craniectomies children-a
4
children-a multicenter
4
multicenter retrospective
4
retrospective cohort
4
study objective
4
objective complications
4
complications pediatric
4
pediatric cranioplasty
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!