Longitudinal Reliability of the OMERACT Thumb Base Osteoarthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (TOMS).

J Rheumatol

From the Departments of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Paris 6, Sorbonne Universités, GRC-08 (EEMOIS); AP-HP, Department of Rheumatology, Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France; Spire Sciences Inc., Boca Raton, Florida; Data and Statistical Sciences, and Immunology Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois; Departments of Radiology and Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California; AbbVie Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and National Institute for Health Research, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Published: September 2019

Objective: To assess the longitudinal reliability of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Thumb base Osteoarthritis Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Scoring system (TOMS).

Methods: Paired MRI of patients with hand osteoarthritis were scored in 2 exercises (6-mo and 2-yr followup) for synovitis, subchondral bone defects (SBD), osteophytes, cartilage assessment, bone marrow lesions (BML), and subluxation. Interreader reliability of delta scores was assessed.

Results: Little change occurred. Average-measure intraclass correlation coefficients were good-excellent (≥ 0.71), except synovitis (0.55-0.83) and carpometacarpal-1 osteophytes/cartilage assessment (0.47/0.39). Percentage exact/close agreement was 52-92%/68-100%, except BML in 2 years (28%/64-76%). Smallest detectable change was below the scoring increment, except in SBD and BML.

Conclusion: TOMS longitudinal reliability was moderate-good. Limited change hampered assessment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.180949DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

longitudinal reliability
12
omeract thumb
8
thumb base
8
base osteoarthritis
8
osteoarthritis magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
scoring system
8
reliability omeract
4
imaging scoring
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!