Background: Bundled payments offer a lump sum for management of particular conditions over a specified period that has the potential to reduce health care payments. In addition, bundled payments represent a shift toward patient-centered reimbursement, which has the upside of improved care coordination among providers and may lead to improved outcomes.

Objective: To review the challenges and sources of payment variation and opportunities for restructuring bundled payments plans in the context of spine surgery.

Methods: We reviewed episodes of care over the past 10 years. We completed a search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design) model in PubMed and Ovid databases to identify studies that met our search criteria.

Results: Ten studies met the search criteria, which were retrospective in design. The primary recipient of reimbursement was the hospital associated with the index procedure (59.7%-77% of the bundled payment), followed by surgeon reimbursement (12.8%-14%) and post-acute care rehabilitation (3.6%-7.3%). On average, the index hospitalization was $32,467, ranging from $11,880 to $107,642, depending on number of levels fused, complications, and malignancy. Readmission was shown to increase the 90-day payment by 50%-200% for uncomplicated fusion.

Conclusions: The implementation of spine surgery in bundled payment models offers opportunity for health care cost reduction. Patient heterogeneity, complications, and index hospitalization pricing are among factors that contribute to the challenge of payment variation. Development of standard care pathways, multidisciplinary coordination between inpatient and outpatient postoperative care, and empowerment of patients are also key elements of progress in the evolution of bundled payments in spine surgery. We anticipate more individualized risk-adjusted prediction models of payment for spine surgery, contributing to more manageable variation in payment and favorable models of bundled payments for payers and providers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bundled payments
20
spine surgery
16
bundled payment
12
bundled
8
payment models
8
health care
8
payment variation
8
studies met
8
met search
8
care
7

Similar Publications

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) can effectively enhance cardiac contraction by engaging the conduction system. LBBAP, compared with right ventricular apex pacing, can reduce QRS duration and enhance left ventricular function. Consequently, LBBAP has been proposed as a viable alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Discharge Disposition after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Analysis of Trends and Predictors of Nonhome Discharge (2011-2021).

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

January 2025

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH (Pasqualini, Ibaseta, T Khan, and Piuzzi), the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (Pan, Xu, and Austin), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL (Corces), and Levitetz Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL (Higuera).

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) practices are evolving under the influence of the current value-based healthcare system and bundled payment models. This study aimed to (1) evaluate national trends in discharge disposition and postoperative outcomes after THA, (2) compare discharge cohorts on episode-of-care parameters, and (3) determine predictors of nonhome discharge from 2011 to 2021.

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for THA data from 2011 to 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of single-bundle (SB) vs. double-bundle (DB) techniques in ACL reconstruction, analyzing ten different studies to primarily assess knee stability and functional outcomes.
  • Results indicated no significant differences in knee stability (Lachman and pivot-shift tests) or patient-reported outcomes (IKDC and Lysholm scores) between SB and DB techniques, suggesting both are equally effective.
  • Moderate variability among the studies pointed to the need for more standardized research methods to confirm these findings across various patient groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • More than a third of peripheral intravenous cannulas (PIVCs) inserted in hospitals remain unused, highlighting issues with documentation and potential complications.
  • A quality improvement project involved conducting an initial audit, implementing changes, and a follow-up audit to assess adherence to a PIVC care bundle.
  • The project aimed for a target adherence score of 90-100% on PIVC documentation and care; results showed a comparison between the first and second cycles, with improved scores indicating successful implementation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Ventricular septal pacing has long been performed using a stylet during pacemaker implantation, but with the availability of guiding catheters, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing have also been performed. However, it is not known to what extent the tip load of the ventricular lead differs when a guiding catheter is used compared with a stylet alone. In this study, the tip load was measured for different stylet stiffness and guiding catheter geometries at sites where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!