Background: Bundled payments offer a lump sum for management of particular conditions over a specified period that has the potential to reduce health care payments. In addition, bundled payments represent a shift toward patient-centered reimbursement, which has the upside of improved care coordination among providers and may lead to improved outcomes.
Objective: To review the challenges and sources of payment variation and opportunities for restructuring bundled payments plans in the context of spine surgery.
Methods: We reviewed episodes of care over the past 10 years. We completed a search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design) model in PubMed and Ovid databases to identify studies that met our search criteria.
Results: Ten studies met the search criteria, which were retrospective in design. The primary recipient of reimbursement was the hospital associated with the index procedure (59.7%-77% of the bundled payment), followed by surgeon reimbursement (12.8%-14%) and post-acute care rehabilitation (3.6%-7.3%). On average, the index hospitalization was $32,467, ranging from $11,880 to $107,642, depending on number of levels fused, complications, and malignancy. Readmission was shown to increase the 90-day payment by 50%-200% for uncomplicated fusion.
Conclusions: The implementation of spine surgery in bundled payment models offers opportunity for health care cost reduction. Patient heterogeneity, complications, and index hospitalization pricing are among factors that contribute to the challenge of payment variation. Development of standard care pathways, multidisciplinary coordination between inpatient and outpatient postoperative care, and empowerment of patients are also key elements of progress in the evolution of bundled payments in spine surgery. We anticipate more individualized risk-adjusted prediction models of payment for spine surgery, contributing to more manageable variation in payment and favorable models of bundled payments for payers and providers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.001 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
December 2024
Clinical Engineering, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, JPN.
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) can effectively enhance cardiac contraction by engaging the conduction system. LBBAP, compared with right ventricular apex pacing, can reduce QRS duration and enhance left ventricular function. Consequently, LBBAP has been proposed as a viable alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Acad Orthop Surg
January 2025
From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH (Pasqualini, Ibaseta, T Khan, and Piuzzi), the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (Pan, Xu, and Austin), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Larkin Community Hospital, South Miami, FL (Corces), and Levitetz Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL (Higuera).
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) practices are evolving under the influence of the current value-based healthcare system and bundled payment models. This study aimed to (1) evaluate national trends in discharge disposition and postoperative outcomes after THA, (2) compare discharge cohorts on episode-of-care parameters, and (3) determine predictors of nonhome discharge from 2011 to 2021.
Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for THA data from 2011 to 2021.
Cureus
January 2025
Diabetes and Endocrinology, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, GBR.
Cureus
November 2024
Cardiology, Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, JPN.
Background Ventricular septal pacing has long been performed using a stylet during pacemaker implantation, but with the availability of guiding catheters, His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing have also been performed. However, it is not known to what extent the tip load of the ventricular lead differs when a guiding catheter is used compared with a stylet alone. In this study, the tip load was measured for different stylet stiffness and guiding catheter geometries at sites where His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing were assumed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!