A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Breast Cancer Cell Line Phenotype Affects Sonoporation Efficiency Under Optimal Ultrasound Microbubble Conditions. | LitMetric

BACKGROUND Ultrasound/microbubble (USMB)-mediated sonoporation is a new strategy with minimal procedural invasiveness for targeted and site-specific drug delivery to tumors. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of different breast cancer cell lines on sonoporation efficiency, and then to identify an optimal combination of USMB parameters to maximize the sonoporation efficiency for each tumor cell line. MATERIAL AND METHODS Three drug-sensitive breast cell lines - MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-468 - and 1 multidrug resistance (MDR) cell line - MCF-7/ADR - were chosen. An orthogonal array experimental design approach based on 3 levels of 3 parameters (A: microbubble concentration, 10%, 20%, and 30%, B: sound intensity, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 W/cm², C: irradiation time, 30, 60, and 90 s) was employed to optimize the sonoporation efficiency. RESULTS The optimal USMB parameter combinations for different cell lines were diverse. Under optimal parameter combinations, the maximum sonoporation efficiency differences between different breast tumor cell lines were statistically significant (MDA-MB-231: 46.70±5.79%, MDA-MB-468: 53.44±5.69%, MCF-7: 59.88±5.53%, MCF-7/ADR: 65.39±4.01%, P<0.05), so were between drug-sensitive cell line and MDR cell line (MCF-7: 59.88±5.53%, MCF-7/ADR: 65.39±4.01%, p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS Different breast tumor cell lines have their own optimal sonoporation. Drug-resistant MCF-7/ADR cells had higher sonoporation efficiency than drug-sensitive MCF-7 cells. The molecular subtype of tumors should be considered when sonoporation is applied, and optimal parameter combination may have the potential to improve drug-delivery efficiency by increasing the sonoporation efficiency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6302661PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910790DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sonoporation efficiency
20
cell lines
16
breast cancer
8
cancer cell
8
efficiency optimal
8
tumor cell
8
parameter combinations
8
cell
7
sonoporation
6
efficiency
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!