A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

What is the impact of the use of transanastomotic feeding tube on patients with esophageal atresia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Background: The transanastomotic feeding tube (TAFT) is widely used around the world in patients with esophageal atresia (EA). However, the safety of the use of TAFT is still unknown and remains to be clarified.

Methods: The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane. Studies comparing outcomes in patients with the use of TAFT (TAFT+) and patients without the use of TAFT (TAFT-) were scrutinized. The quality of included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale score. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I value. A fixed or random-effect model was applied.

Results: Four retrospective controlled studies involving 455 patients were included. The pooled estimates showed that the use of TAFT significantly increased the risk of stricture, with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.83 (95% CI 1.30-2.58; P = 0.0005). The meta-analyses of other postoperative complications did not show significant differences between TAFT+ and TAFT- group, with a RR of 1.65 (95% CI 0.93-2.93; P = 0.09) for anastomotic leakage, 0.91 (95% CI 0.34-2.44; P = 0.85) for sepsis, 1.89 (95% CI 0.22-16.20; P = 0.56) for tracheomalacia, 0.50 (95% CI 0.13-1.93; P = 0.31) for gastroesophageal reflux, 1.29 (95% CI 0.28-5.92; P = 0.74) for wound infection, and 0.97 (95% CI 0.03-36.75; p = 0.99) for pneumonia.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the use of TAFT in patients with EA significantly increases the risk of stricture. However, TAFT is not associated with other complications, including anastomotic leakage, sepsis, tracheomalacia, gastroesophageal reflux, wound infection and pneumonia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292097PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1359-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transanastomotic feeding
8
feeding tube
8
patients esophageal
8
esophageal atresia
8
taft patients
8
patients taft
8
risk stricture
8
anastomotic leakage
8
gastroesophageal reflux
8
wound infection
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!