Background: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in reducing plaque and inflammation around dental implants.
Methods: Eighty patients presenting dental implants were enrolled in this study and assigned randomly to two different groups: 40 patients in the test group and 40 in the control one. Each patient in the test group received an oscillating-rotating toothbrush while in the control group patients kept using the manual toothbrush. Furthermore, the test group received a special toothbrush head designed for dental implants and another one for natural teeth. Domiciliary oral hygiene instructions were given to both groups. Periodontal parameters like plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BoP), and probing pocket depth (PPD) were recorded at the baseline and after 1 and 3 months.
Results: At the end of the study, the difference of plaque and bleeding indices with the baseline was statistically significant for both test and control groups (P < 0.0001). Implant sites showed higher values of both BoP and PI when compared to the natural teeth. In the second part of the study, comparing the 1-3-month period, the oscillating-rotating toothbrush was effective in reducing new plaque formation (P < 0.0001) and bleeding (P < 0.0001) both at the implant sites and the dental sites comparing to manual ones (P > 0.05). No significant differences were appreciated concerning the PPD.
Conclusions: The oscillating-rotating toothbrush can be successfully used for the plaque and bleeding control of the peri-implant tissues.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6286907 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0150-6 | DOI Listing |
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent
October 2024
School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Oral Investig
August 2024
University Hospital for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the cleansing efficacy of the Oral-B iO™ electric toothbrush incorporating oscillating-rotating technology with microvibrations - with a traditional oscillating-rotating toothbrush.
Materials And Methods: Thirty adult participants were randomly assigned to use the iO™ electric toothbrush with the brush head iO™ Ultimate Clean or the traditional oscillating-rotating toothbrush Oral-B Genius with the Cross-Action brush head. Oral hygiene indices (Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index and Gingival Bleeding Index) were assessed before and after 28 days of home use of the assigned product.
J Prosthet Dent
September 2024
Private Practice, Istanbul, Turkey.
Statement Of Problem: Early tightening torque at the implant-healing abutment interface is a recognized concern in implant treatment. However, little is known regarding the effects of toothbrushing methods on the interface established between the implant and healing abutments of different heights.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different toothbrushing methods on tightening torque for healing abutments of different heights.
Int J Dent Hyg
February 2025
Clinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Objective: The objective of this long-term clinical study was to evaluate the influence of a newly developed powered toothbrush (PT) on the size and number of pre-existing gingival recessions (GR) in comparison to a manual toothbrush (MT).
Methods: This was a prospective, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical study. Participants without periodontitis, but with at least two teeth (index teeth) showing GR ≥2 mm were randomized to brush either twice daily with a MT or with a PT with a linear magnetic drive causing the round brush head to produce gentle micro vibrations along with oscillating-rotating movements.
Healthcare (Basel)
May 2024
School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
The removal of dental plaque from the gingival margins of the teeth is essential to maintaining periodontal health. Whilst it has been established that electric toothbrushes demonstrate a greater ability to remove plaque, no systematic review has specifically investigated which technology is better for removing plaque from the interdental tooth surfaces, where plaque control may be more difficult. Three databases were searched until October 2023: MEDLINE and DOSSS via EBSCOhost and Embase.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!