An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4216-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

correction harmonization
4
harmonization needed
4
needed fdg
4
fdg pet/ct
4
pet/ct prognosticator
4
prognosticator demonstration
4
demonstration earl-compliant
4
earl-compliant suv
4
suv independent
4
independent prognostic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!