Background: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a stool biomarker that has been shown to be sensitive and specific for mucosal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The test is limited by the requirement for patients to collect and return stool samples. A home-based FC test may improve test adherence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usability of the IBDoc, a home-based FC measuring test, and to determine the accuracy of results compared with traditional lab-based ELISA values.
Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled from 3 tertiary sites across Canada between May and August 2017. Patients completed a questionnaire establishing ease-of-use of the IBDoc. Patients completed a FC measurement using the IBDoc, and results were compared with an ELISA-determined FC measurement on the same stool sample.
Results: Sixty-one participants were enrolled in the study (29 CD, 32 UC). Seventy-nine percent of patients (48 of 61) agreed that the IBDoc was easy to use, with 85% (52 of 61) of patients strongly agreeing that they were willing use the home kit in the future. The IBDoc and ELISA measurement comparison showed an 88% agreement across all values. There were no false positives or negatives using qualitative comparison.
Conclusions: The home-based IBDoc FC measuring test is acceptable to patients and correlates extremely well with the standard ELISA-determined FC value. The IBDoc enables clinicians to more easily adopt a treat-to-target approach, improve long-term outcomes, and patients' quality of life with IBD. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03408249.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izy357 | DOI Listing |
Sci Rep
May 2023
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IBD Clinical Research Program, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Suite 441 - 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada.
A home point-of care FCP test (IBDoc) and a self-reported clinical disease activity program (IBD Dashboard) may improve routine monitoring of IBD activity during pregnancy. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of tight control management using remote monitoring in pregnant patients with IBD. Pregnant patients (< 20 weeks) with IBD were prospectively enrolled from Mount Sinai Hospital between 2019 and 2020.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
December 2021
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Greece.
Scand J Gastroenterol
January 2021
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Objectives: Self-monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with the assistant of telemedicine and home-based fecal calprotectin (FC) tests is evolving in the management of IBD. We performed a randomized controlled trial to investigate the compliance and effects of the model IBD-Home in patients with IBD.
Materials And Methods: Patients were randomized to IBD-Home + standard care ( = 84) or standard care alone ( = 74).
J Clin Med
August 2020
Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, University of Lorraine, 54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Technological progress, including virtual clinics, web or smartphone-based applications, and assessment of fecal calprotectin (FC) at home has favored the implementation of treat to target strategies for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Although these innovations are promising and have been associated with a significant reduction in health costs, their application in clinical practice is limited. Here, we summarize the most recent literature on virtual clinics and available FC home tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInflamm Bowel Dis
June 2020
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, and Department of Gastroenterology, Southern District Health Board, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Background: Providing timely follow-up care for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission is important but often difficult because of resource limitations. Using smartphones to communicate symptoms and biomarkers is a potential alternative. We aimed to compare outpatient management using 2 smartphone apps (IBDsmart for symptoms and IBDoc for fecal calprotectin monitoring) vs standard face-to-face care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!