A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitor InBody BPBIO320 for public use according to the 2010 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol. | LitMetric

Validation of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitor InBody BPBIO320 for public use according to the 2010 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.

Blood Press Monit

Hypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Published: February 2019

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor InBody BPBIO320 developed for self-measurement by adults in public spaces according to the 2010 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol (ESH-IP).

Participants And Methods: Adults were recruited to fulfill the ESH-IP requirements. The same-arm sequential BP measurement method was used.

Results: A total of 38 participants were recruited and 33 were included in the analysis. The average difference between test and reference BP measurements was-0.4±5.3 (SD)/-0.5±4.6 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). The number of test-reference BP differences within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg was 73, 91, and 98 for systolic BP and 79, 93, and 99 for diastolic. The number of participants with at least two of their three BP differences within 5 mmHg was 28 for both systolic and diastolic BPs. The number of participants with none of their three BP differences within 5 mmHg was 1 for both systolic and diastolic BPs.

Conclusion: The InBody BPBIO320 device fulfilled the requirements of the ESH-IP validation protocol and can be recommended for clinical use in adults.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000359DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inbody bpbio320
12
systolic diastolic
12
single-cuff oscillometric
8
oscillometric blood
8
blood pressure
8
pressure monitor
8
monitor inbody
8
2010 european
8
european society
8
society hypertension
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!