AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate a brief behavioral intervention's effectiveness in preventing weight gain during the Christmas holiday among adults in Birmingham, UK.
  • Participants included 272 adults, divided into two groups: one that received the intervention and another that received a standard healthy living leaflet.
  • The results showed that the intervention group had a slight weight loss (-0.13 kg), while the comparator group experienced a weight gain (0.37 kg), indicating the intervention's potential effectiveness in limiting holiday weight gain.

Article Abstract

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention to prevent weight gain over the Christmas holiday period.

Design: Two group, double blinded randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Recruitment from workplaces, social media platforms, and schools pre-Christmas 2016 and 2017 in Birmingham, UK.

Participants: 272 adults aged 18 years or more with a body mass index of 20 or more: 136 were randomised to a brief behavioural intervention and 136 to a leaflet on healthy living (comparator). Baseline assessments were conducted in November and December with follow-up assessments in January and February (4-8 weeks after baseline).

Interventions: The intervention aimed to increase restraint of eating and drinking through regular self weighing and recording of weight and reflection on weight trajectory; providing information on good weight management strategies over the Christmas period; and pictorial information on the physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) of regularly consumed festive foods and drinks. The goal was to gain no more than 0.5 kg of baseline weight. The comparator group received a leaflet on healthy living.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was weight at follow-up. The primary analysis compared weight at follow-up between the intervention and comparator arms, adjusting for baseline weight and the stratification variable of attendance at a commercial weight loss programme. Secondary outcomes (recorded at follow-up) were: weight gain of 0.5 kg or less, self reported frequency of self weighing (at least twice weekly versus less than twice weekly), percentage body fat, and cognitive restraint of eating, emotional eating, and uncontrolled eating.

Results: Mean weight change was -0.13 kg (95% confidence interval -0.4 to 0.15) in the intervention group and 0.37 kg (0.12 to 0.62) in the comparator group. The adjusted mean difference in weight (intervention-comparator) was -0.49 kg (95% confidence interval -0.85 to -0.13, P=0.008). The odds ratio for gaining no more than 0.5 kg was non-significant (1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 2.00, P=0.44).

Conclusion: A brief behavioural intervention involving regular self weighing, weight management advice, and information about the amount of physical activity required to expend the calories in festive foods and drinks prevented weight gain over the Christmas holiday period.

Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15071781.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6287121PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4867DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

behavioural intervention
16
weight gain
16
weight
15
gain christmas
12
christmas holiday
12
95% confidence
12
confidence interval
12
effectiveness behavioural
8
intervention prevent
8
prevent weight
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!