Echocardiographic calcifications are associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A recently described semiquantitative Global Cardiac Calcium Score (GCCS) has been associated with mortality and stroke, with increasing scores associated with increasing risk. This score assigns points for calcium in the aortic root and valve, mitral valve and annulus, and submitral apparatus, with additional points for restricted leaflet mobility. We tested the hypothesis that the GCCS could improve prediction of MACE beyond traditional risk scores. This was a retrospective study of 216 subjects from a general echocardiography database (mean age 59 ± 15; 51% male). Follow-up was 3.8 ± 1.7 years. The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) were applied to each patient. Mean GCCS was 3.2 ± 2. In the total cohort, GCCS predicted MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality), even after adjusting for FRS (odd ratio 1.19, p = 0.03). There were 106 subjects (49%) in the low-risk FRS group, 71 (33%) in the intermediate-risk group, and 39 (18%) in the high-risk group. GCCS ≥3 was associated with increased MACE (vs <3) in the low-risk group (p = 0.03), while GCCS <3 was associated with decreased MACE (vs ≥3) in the high-risk group (p = 0.04). When applied to the PCE risk estimate (dichotomized at <7.5% vs ≥7.5%) the GCCS similarly refined risk prediction. In conclusion, the semiquantitative GCCS appears to be a marker of additional unaccounted risk factors; it is easily applied and can further stratify risk of MACE beyond traditional FRS or PCE estimates.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.009 | DOI Listing |
Cancer Treat Res Commun
January 2025
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Aim: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer among women and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in this population. Numerous factors have been identified as either risk factors or protective factors for breast cancer. However, the role of Vitamin D (Vit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Galveston, Texas. Electronic address:
Introduction: Hospital-based violence intervention programs primarily target adults, raising questions about the effectiveness in preventing pediatric firearm deaths. We hypothesized that pediatric and adult firearm injury deaths are different enough to require unique intervention strategies.
Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted of medical examiner and trauma center records of firearm-related deaths in the largest metropolitan county in Texas.
J Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Introduction: Access to rehabilitation services after a traumatic injury improves functional outcomes. No study has examined the association between injury intent, violent versus nonviolent, and receipt of rehabilitation services after injury.
Materials And Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured adult patients admitted to our level I trauma center from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2021.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
January 2025
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Background: A number of efforts have been made to tailor behavioral healthcare treatments to the variable needs of patients with low back pain (LBP). The most common approach involves the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) to triage the need for psychologically informed care, which explores concerns about pain and addresses unhelpful beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Such beliefs that pain always signifies injury or tissue damage and that exercise should be avoided have been implied as psychosocial mediators of chronic pain and can impede recovery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
January 2025
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Background: There is debate as to whether kinematic TKA or mechanical alignment TKA is superior. Recent systematic reviews have suggested that kinematically aligned TKAs may be the preferred option. However, the observed differences in alignment favoring kinematic alignment may not improve outcomes (performance or durability) in ways that patients can perceive, and likewise, statistical differences in outcome scores sometimes observed in clinical trials may be too small for patients to notice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!