Deception varies across individuals and social contexts. The present research explored how individual difference measured by social value orientations, and situations, affect deception in moral hypocrisy. In two experiments, participants made allocations between themselves and recipients with an opportunity to deceive recipients where recipients cannot reject their allocations. Experiment 1 demonstrated that proselfs were more deceptive and hypocritical than prosocials by lying to be apparently fair, especially when deception was unrevealed. Experiment 2 showed that proselfs were more concerned about social image in deception in moral hypocrisy than prosocials were. They decreased apparent fairness when deception was revealed and evaluated by a third-party reviewer and increased it when deception was evaluated but unrevealed. These results show that prosocials and proselfs differed in pursuing deception and moral hypocrisy social goals and provide implications for decreasing deception and moral hypocrisy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258808 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02268 | DOI Listing |
Bioethics
November 2024
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
The ethical permissibility of the "slow code" sparks vigorous debate. However, definitions of the "slow code" that exist in the literature often leave room for interpretation. Thus, those assessing the ethical permissibility of the slow code may not be operating with shared definitions, and definitions may not align with clinicians' understanding and use of the term in clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Child Psychol
October 2023
Wheaton College, Norton, MA 02766, USA.
This research examined how children evaluate the legitimacy of various sorts of rules as well as children's reasoning about the legitimacy of covertly defying and lying to parents to resist those rules. We asked U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBioethics
October 2024
Department of Philosophy, Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey, USA.
Despite its prevalence today, the practice of purely performative resuscitation (PPR)-paradigmatically, the "slow code"-has attracted more critics in bioethics than defenders. The most common criticism of the slow code is that it's fundamentally deceptive or harmful, while the most common justification offered is that it may benefit the patient's loved ones, by symbolically honoring the patient or the care team's relationship with the family. I argue that critics and defenders of the slow code each have a point.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Ethics
October 2024
Department of Political Science, Dhaka International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Background: Truth-telling in health care is about providing patients with accurate information about their diagnoses and prognoses to enable them to make decisions that can benefit their overall health. Physicians worldwide, especially in the United Kingdom (U.K.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Soc Psychol
October 2024
Department of Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!