A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Early Weight Gain in Infants With Cleft Lip and Palate Treated With and Without Nasoalveolar Molding: A Retrospective Study. | LitMetric

Objective: To assess weight gain of infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL ± P) treated with nasoalveolar molding (NAM).

Design: Retrospective, case-control chart review.

Setting: Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Patients, Participants: Infants with nonsyndromic CL ± P and noncleft controls.

Interventions: Prior to primary lip surgery, NAM was either included (+NAM) or not included (-NAM) in the cleft treatment protocol.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Weight gain and percentage weight gain relative to initial weight were compared among +NAM, -NAM, and control groups from birth to 7 months and from birth to 36 months.

Results: Comparing +NAM and -NAM groups, no significant difference in weight or percentage weight gain was found in either time window. Compared to controls, from birth to 7 months, both CL ± P groups weighed less ( < .001), while percentage weight gain was greater for the +NAM ( < .001) and did not differ for -NAM. From birth to 36 months relative to controls, weight for +NAM showed no significant difference and -NAM weighed less ( < .01), while percentage weight gain was greater for both CL ± P groups ( < .001).

Conclusions: Comparisons of CL ± P infants treated with and without NAM showed that with the NAM appliance, despite its added complexity, there was no adverse impact on weight gain. Comparisons to noncleft, control infants suggests that NAM treatment may have a beneficial impact on weight gain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1055665618815396DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weight gain
36
percentage weight
16
birth months
12
weight
11
gain
9
gain infants
8
infants cleft
8
cleft lip
8
palate treated
8
treated nasoalveolar
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!