AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of GB242, a potential biosimilar to infliximab, against the reference infliximab in healthy Chinese participants.
  • A randomized, double-blind trial with 48 subjects was conducted, where participants received either GB242 or the reference drug; blood samples were collected for analysis of drug levels and safety assessments.
  • Results showed that GB242 had similar pharmacokinetic profiles and safety profiles to reference infliximab, indicating potential equivalence as a biosimilar treatment.

Article Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and immunogenicity of GB242 as a potential biosimilar infliximab with those of reference infliximab in healthy Chinese subjects.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-center, double-blind, parallel-controlled phase I study in which 48 healthy subjects were divided equally into a GB242 group and reference infliximab group. Both the test and reference drug were administered as a single intravenous dose of 3 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected as per a designated schedule to evaluate PKs and immunogenicity. Safety was assessed throughout the study. PK similarity was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios of the GB242 to reference infliximab for maximum concentration (C), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC), and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC) were within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80-125%.

Results: The mean serum concentration-time curves were similar between GB242 and reference infliximab. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of the GB242 to reference infliximab for C, AUC, and AUC were completely within 80-125% for the PK similarity comparison. The proportion of subjects with treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the GB242 group and the reference infliximab group. Antidrug antibody profiles were comparable between the two treatments groups.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated high PK similarity between GB242 and its marketed reference infliximab in healthy subjects. Both treatments showed comparable safety and immunogenicity.

Registration Number: ChiCTR-IPR-15007098.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-018-0326-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reference infliximab
32
gb242 reference
16
infliximab healthy
12
healthy subjects
12
reference
9
infliximab
9
phase study
8
safety immunogenicity
8
gb242
8
gb242 group
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: To compare a new ready-to-use monotest immunoassay, CHORUS Promonitor, for the quantification of serum biological drug levels and anti-drug antibodies of anti-TNF agents, against the reference batch-based ELISA test, Promonitor.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from patients treated with anti-TNF agents, infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADL). IFX and ADL levels, as well as anti-IFX and anti-ADL antibodies were quantified and compared between the standard ELISA reference test, Promonitor, and the automated monotest ELISA assay, CHORUS Promonitor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Infliximab is an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent used to treat rheumatologic disease. Evidence on the safety of switching to biosimilars and the associated risk factors for flares/loss of disease control within rheumatology is limited. The primary objective is to evaluate nonmedical switches from reference infliximab to biosimilars in rheumatology on risks and level of disease control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: As China is one of the countries with the highest recorded cases of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs), these diseases have also emerged as a serious public health concern. Biosimilars, potentially lower-cost versions of biologics, may improve access to more affordable yet comparably effective treatments. Encouragingly, China launched its abbreviated biosimilar pathway in 2015, and since then, a large number of biosimilars have been approved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Data regarding multiple switches including reverse switching between infliximab and its biosimilars are scarce in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Objectives: We investigated the clinical effectiveness as primary outcome measure after repeated switches. Secondary endpoints included C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, immunogenicity (trough levels (TL); anti-drug antibodies (ADA), safety and drug persistence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tracing the historical foundations of infliximab in Crohn's disease treatment: a cited reference analysis.

Front Pharmacol

November 2024

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Introduction: The use of infliximab to treat Crohn's disease patients has been evaluated for decades. The current work aimed to identify the historical roots of this research topic.

Methods: The literature database Web of Science Core Collection was searched to identify relevant papers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!