Principle V, Opinion 1.1.6 ("Quality") and Opinion 5.5 ("Medically Ineffective Interventions") are explored here to briefly explain physicians' responsibilities when it comes to false or medically inappropriate interventions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2018.1049 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Exploring the shared genetic landscape of diabetes and cardiovascular disease: findings and future implications.
Diabetologia
March 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Diabetes is a rapidly growing global health concern projected to affect one in eight adults by 2045, which translates to roughly 783 million people. The profound metabolic alterations often present in dysglycaemia significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular complications. While genetic susceptibility plays a crucial role in diabetes and its vascular complications, identifying genes and molecular mechanisms that influence both diseases simultaneously has proven challenging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAssociation of EHR-Integrated Secure Messaging Use with Clinician Workload and Attention Switching.
J Gen Intern Med
March 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Background: Secure messaging use for clinician-to-clinician communication has grown rapidly in recent years.
Objective: To examine the association between secure messaging use, electronic health record (EHR) time, and frequency of attention switching among clinicians primarily working in an inpatient setting.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Stigmatizing attitudes toward people with migraine by people without active migraine: results of the OVERCOME (US) study.
BMC Neurol
March 2025
Montefiore Headache Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, US.
Background: Migraine is associated with various types of stigma. This study aims to evaluate stigmatizing attitudes towards people with migraine by people without active migraine.
Methods: OVERCOME (US) was a web survey among adults from a representative US population-based sample that collected information about stigmatizing attitudes of people without active migraine (i.
Initial management of patients with burns and combined injuries for acute care surgeons: What you need to know.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
March 2025
From the Division of Trauma, Burn and Critical Care Surgery (B.T.S., D.J., S.A.), Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Division of Acute Care Surgery (M.A.H.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery (L.J.), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and Department of Surgery (L.J.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract: There are nearly 700,000 adults and children with burn injuries who seek care in America each year. While most patients with major burn injuries are cared for at American Burn Association-verified burn centers, many of them present to nonburn centers initially or present with combined burns and other injuries. Despite this, burn surgery is no longer mandated by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education for general surgery residency and is rarely a meaningful component of surgical critical care fellowships.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImproving peer review of systematic reviews and related review types by involving librarians and information specialists as methodological peer reviewers: a randomised controlled trial.
BMJ Evid Based Med
March 2025
Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of adding librarians and information specialists (LIS) as methodological peer reviewers to the formal journal peer review process on the quality of search reporting and risk of bias in systematic review searches in the medical literature.
Design: Pragmatic two-group parallel randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Three biomedical journals.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!