Introduction: Currently, molecular studies are widely used as a guiding tool in further management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. At our institution, clinicians have recently expressed concern over receiving "less positive molecular results" upon switching from an extended 14 gene mutation panel (EGMP) to a 7 gene mutation panel (GMP). Our goal is to compare outcomes of these two tests in regards to the performance characteristics and clinical impact.
Materials And Methods: All thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy specimens sent for molecular studies from 2016 to 2017 were retrospectively studied. Cytopathology diagnosis, pertinent clinical findings, molecular results, and follow-up (F/U) surgical and cytology diagnoses were recorded.
Results: Of the total 165 cases sent for molecular tests 86 (52%) were GMP and 79 (47%) EGMP. There were 21 (24%) and 40 (50%) cases with positive GMP and EGMP results, respectively. Within these positive cases (n = 61), there were a total of 33 (54%) patients who underwent surgical resection and 28 (45%) patients had no follow-up. The molecular findings and surgical pathologic diagnoses obtained are illustrated in Figures 1 through 4 for GMP and EGMP, respectively.
Conclusions: The selection of molecular testing should be directed toward optimizing patient care and facilitate clinical management. This quality assurance study helped in understanding the complexities associated with test selection best suited for our institution and in educating clinicians.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dc.24091 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!